Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-25-2012, 09:34 AM   #1
Member
Ed Blake
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,341
Thanks: 861
Thanked 931 Times in 376 Posts

Default

I believe the issue of barrel honing can be overstated. Chances are if you have a typical "brown" gun that is in used but not abused condition, the barrels have not been touched. Plus, when you consider how Parker changed bore dimensions in the early '90s it can be confusing. That's where TPS comes in handy. This is, of course, giving no consideration to "high" condition guns of questionable provenance, which, in that case: Caveat emptor baby.
Ed Blake is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-25-2012, 09:41 AM   #2
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,901
Thanks: 6,989
Thanked 10,339 Times in 5,456 Posts

Default

.735 would be the medium-high side of post 1895 12 gauge Parkers. It is way too small to be one of the earlier guns. Austin Hogan and I have both measured more than a few original appearing, apparently unmolested Parkers, especially single barrels, that are bigger than the nominal .729 or .730, some as big as the very high thirties. Remember, even if this gun had been honed from .729 to .735, wall thickness would only change by .003.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.