Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums

Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums (https://parkerguns.org/forums/index.php)
-   General Parker Discussions (https://parkerguns.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Have these been honed? (https://parkerguns.org/forums/showthread.php?t=7168)

Bob Dombeck 05-23-2012 09:36 PM

Have these been honed?
 
Here are some bore measurements taken on a set of Damascus 12ga. barrels. I just want you guys opinions as to if these seem to have been honed.

RH barrel .736 ID at full length of the Skeet bore gauge from Brownells
4" in from muzzle .734
3" " " .733
2" " " .728
1" " " .710
1/2" " .699

Left barrel dimensions are all within about .002 of the RH.

The gun came new choked Full and Full, 30" barrels
I would think that the full choke constriction should start further back from the muzzle.

I checked barrel wall thickness as follows.
RH 16" in from muzzle .041"
average is .031 overall
thinnest is .028
muzzle is .049"

LH 16" in from muzzle .046"
average is .032"
muzzle is .051"

Any opinions would be appreciated.
Thank you.

Rick Losey 05-23-2012 09:40 PM

i would doubt an untouched barrel would have a spot that is 28 thousands or a 31 average.

Chris Travinski 05-24-2012 06:48 AM

If I'm correct on the math, that makes .063" for the choke. Isn't full usually around .035-.040" ish?

Mike Shepherd 05-24-2012 06:57 AM

Choke is .035". The wall thicknesses, bore diameters and choke dimensions all look factory to me.

Best,

Mike

Leighton Stallones 05-24-2012 11:57 AM

Same here as Mike. About the same as my VH.

Eric Eis 05-24-2012 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leighton Stallones (Post 70673)
Same here as Mike. About the same as my VH.

I agree with the above.

Bill Murphy 05-24-2012 12:59 PM

Sorry, Chris, you're not correct with your math. The gun is just like most post 1895 Parkers, both in bore and choke.

Rick Losey 05-24-2012 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Murphy (Post 70680)
Sorry, Chris, you're not correct with your math. The gun is just like most post 1895 Parkers, both in bore and choke.

And wall thickness? Admittedly no Parker expert, but i would have expected more meat in damascus.

I measured a set of Parker tubes that I know for the fact were honed at least twice and that is almost exactly the wall measurements. I need to go back to the DGJ destructive tests and see where those Parkers fell.

Other damascus I have measured (light English guns) were thicker, and K Kearcher had lightly honed one of them for me.

Still learning here, a lot :)

Thanks

Bill Murphy 05-24-2012 01:40 PM

Could have been ground down on the outside. Or the measurements could be a little off.

Mike Shepherd 05-24-2012 02:12 PM

I once owned a very high condition DH with Damascus barrels. It came with a small dent in the choke of the right barrel. I sent it to Kirk Merrington. He called me and said the dent came out fine. Said the wall thickness right at the beginning of the choke was .019" and that he had no doubt that is how it left the factory. Also have a high condition sixteen DHE, also sent to Kirk, also with MWT .019" right ahead of the chokes, also, in Kirk's opinion and my opinion, left the Parker factory that way.


Best,

Mike


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org