Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Have these been honed?
Unread 05-23-2012, 09:36 PM   #1
Member
Quack me up!
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 162
Thanks: 235
Thanked 99 Times in 35 Posts

Default Have these been honed?

Here are some bore measurements taken on a set of Damascus 12ga. barrels. I just want you guys opinions as to if these seem to have been honed.

RH barrel .736 ID at full length of the Skeet bore gauge from Brownells
4" in from muzzle .734
3" " " .733
2" " " .728
1" " " .710
1/2" " .699

Left barrel dimensions are all within about .002 of the RH.

The gun came new choked Full and Full, 30" barrels
I would think that the full choke constriction should start further back from the muzzle.

I checked barrel wall thickness as follows.
RH 16" in from muzzle .041"
average is .031 overall
thinnest is .028
muzzle is .049"

LH 16" in from muzzle .046"
average is .032"
muzzle is .051"

Any opinions would be appreciated.
Thank you.
Bob Dombeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-23-2012, 09:40 PM   #2
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,936
Thanks: 1,783
Thanked 8,548 Times in 3,348 Posts

Default

i would doubt an untouched barrel would have a spot that is 28 thousands or a 31 average.
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-24-2012, 06:48 AM   #3
Member
Chris T.
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 877
Thanks: 551
Thanked 572 Times in 274 Posts

Default

If I'm correct on the math, that makes .063" for the choke. Isn't full usually around .035-.040" ish?
Chris Travinski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-24-2012, 06:57 AM   #4
Member
AmarilloMike
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Shepherd's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1,158
Thanked 403 Times in 147 Posts

Default

Choke is .035". The wall thicknesses, bore diameters and choke dimensions all look factory to me.

Best,

Mike
Mike Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Shepherd For Your Post:
Unread 05-24-2012, 11:57 AM   #5
Member
Leighton Stallones
Forum Associate
 
Leighton Stallones's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 197
Thanks: 0
Thanked 70 Times in 34 Posts

Default

Same here as Mike. About the same as my VH.
Leighton Stallones is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-24-2012, 12:22 PM   #6
Member
Opening Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,905
Thanks: 11,203
Thanked 2,108 Times in 1,202 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leighton Stallones View Post
Same here as Mike. About the same as my VH.
I agree with the above.
Eric Eis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-24-2012, 12:59 PM   #7
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,554
Thanks: 6,771
Thanked 9,904 Times in 5,258 Posts

Default

Sorry, Chris, you're not correct with your math. The gun is just like most post 1895 Parkers, both in bore and choke.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-24-2012, 01:13 PM   #8
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,936
Thanks: 1,783
Thanked 8,548 Times in 3,348 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy View Post
Sorry, Chris, you're not correct with your math. The gun is just like most post 1895 Parkers, both in bore and choke.
And wall thickness? Admittedly no Parker expert, but i would have expected more meat in damascus.

I measured a set of Parker tubes that I know for the fact were honed at least twice and that is almost exactly the wall measurements. I need to go back to the DGJ destructive tests and see where those Parkers fell.

Other damascus I have measured (light English guns) were thicker, and K Kearcher had lightly honed one of them for me.

Still learning here, a lot

Thanks
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-24-2012, 01:40 PM   #9
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,554
Thanks: 6,771
Thanked 9,904 Times in 5,258 Posts

Default

Could have been ground down on the outside. Or the measurements could be a little off.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-24-2012, 02:12 PM   #10
Member
AmarilloMike
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Shepherd's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1,158
Thanked 403 Times in 147 Posts

Default

I once owned a very high condition DH with Damascus barrels. It came with a small dent in the choke of the right barrel. I sent it to Kirk Merrington. He called me and said the dent came out fine. Said the wall thickness right at the beginning of the choke was .019" and that he had no doubt that is how it left the factory. Also have a high condition sixteen DHE, also sent to Kirk, also with MWT .019" right ahead of the chokes, also, in Kirk's opinion and my opinion, left the Parker factory that way.


Best,

Mike
Mike Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.