 |
|
 |
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
01-23-2013, 01:42 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,704 Times in 2,676 Posts
|
|
The one you are thinking of is a 1904 CHE 20/26 Damascus. Patterned by Parker with 7/8oz, 2 1/4 dre. It has original chokes at left full, right IC. The combination of full and IC chokes occurs frequently in Parkers intended for upland game use.
When we compare the guns, we see in this instance Parker used a lighter patterning load on a fluid steel gun than a damascus gun, both 0 frame 20's and generally comparable intended usage.
|
|
|
|
01-23-2013, 02:26 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
PGCA Invincible Life Member
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,353
Thanks: 39,771
Thanked 36,720 Times in 13,411 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Day
The one you are thinking of is a 1904 CHE 20/26 Damascus. Patterned by Parker with 7/8oz, 2 1/4 dre. It has original chokes at left full, right IC. The combination of full and IC chokes occurs frequently in Parkers intended for upland game use.
Yes, you're right Bruce.
When we compare the guns, we see in this instance Parker used a lighter patterning load on a fluid steel gun than a damascus gun, both 0 frame 20's and generally comparable intended usage.
|
That's very interesting and I wonder if it is significant in how Parker Bros. may have perceived the strength of the different barrel steels to be.
|
|
|
|