![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||||||
|
![]()
But was Hayes’ rim cutter made to the later wider size?
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Now that you mention it Mike, my skills do lean towards the sporty Spitfire. ![]()
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Daryl Corona For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | ||||||
|
![]()
Dean, you beat me to it. Hayes' rim cutter may be the pre 1906 model. I hope Edgar isn't too proud to ask me who I borrowed one from. He's a great guy and would be willing to lend it out again. By the way, its a full chamber and forcing cone reamer in one. I checked the price and you don't want to buy one.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | ||||||
|
![]()
Next time I see him, I'll ask. I do know that I loaned to another member who reported back that it was perfect. I do not believe there was a "later wider size" but do know that early rim recesses were shallower.
Yes Bill, I was looking at new ones in Clymers catalog. Like the Hayes tool, the Clymer tool is Just for cutting the rim recess. It is not a chamber reamer. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | ||||||
|
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | ||||||
|
![]()
The one I used, whether it was a Clymer or a Manson, cut all the way up, including the rim recess. It was a very light cut on the forcing cone, didn't take any metal off my cones.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | ||||||
|
![]()
The DH I used to have 1903 (see Avatar) would have trouble closing on new shells and if it would close, would be verry difficult to open. Some different manufacturers new shells would work just fine, some not. The problem seemed to be the brass rim. If there was a slight radius between the wall and rim, it wouldn't seat right. If it was almost a 90 degree angle, they worked fine. I had the rim cut worked on by Dewey.
I'm way to young to know about those planes. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | ||||||
|
![]()
I have a Clymer 12ga rim recess reamer I got to ream out my DH12 that has issues with Win AA hulls that have out of round rims. It has no issues with Rem STS hulls or old paper hulls. I've never reamed it yet because when you slide the pilot into the chamber and put the reamer cutters against the breech it's clear that the breech is not cut orthogonal to the bore center line as the cutting teeth aren't hitting evenly. This is assuming, of course, that the reamer is properly machined, which is not guaranteed. I can't see where the breech wouldn't be orthogonal to the bore. Anyone ever see this before? My cure for the DH12 has been to never shoot AA hulls in it. My 28ga Repro sticks with AA hulls also, sometimes seriously enough that you can't get it open without gently clamping it in a rubber jawed vise just enough to allow releasing the lever and opening it. So, I don't shoot the newer AA HS hulls in that one either. Vintage paper shells have nice round rims and work just fine.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|