![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Good info, thanks much. I am in USA. My only reason for the Nitro Proofing idea was to validate the condition and a safety issue. If we can determine otherwise then I am OK. I don't expect to push any loads as I have other guns to do that with. This is just for fun and to own a piece of fine history in a fine Parker. Great advice. Thanks for your support.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
a Parker research letter may show you if the gun was originally 2 3/4, Or a call to Doug Turnbull's shop may let you know if it was opened there They may also have records of what was done to the barrels- most importantly - was any metal removed to clean up the bores. But I seriously doubt a gun left his shop dressed up with no place to go - (safe to shoot) so the question would be has it been altered since the restoration.
My opinion is that the most important thing to know is the wall thickness. Many of these gun had plenty of meat in them to start - and a light cleaning out did those no harm. these old guns - when in safe condition - are a blast (pun intended) to shoot. I shot a DH damascus over my dogs several times this season. where are you located? we might be able to find a shop near you with the knowledge to check them.
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Wall thickness and bore condition are key here. Why chance nitro proofing them and having catastrophic results? When an RST load will work just fine. Again considering safe wall thickness and good bores. I do not know how long ago Turnbull restored this gun, but I would not think him to restore a gun that was not safe to shoot. But you never know.
RST shells are reasonably priced for the benefits they have, starting at around $10 a box.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
O.H. I am in UT. Maybe a good idea to get to a qualified gunsmith for a checkout on barrels and thickness and a once over inspection. I'm hoping the 2-3/4" chamber is original but don't know that yet. A letter is a good idea also.
B. Dudley, I would think if the gun was very questionable that D. Turnbull would not have gone through the restoration. I can't yet speak to the 2-3/4" chamber, that is the listing. I saw a 1900 that was 2-1/2". I will need to verify. Do we have any idea what the wall thickness should have been to start and/or what is "safe and acceptable"? Thanks for the advice and details. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
some light reading on the wall thickness question
http://parkerguns.org/forums/showthr...wall+thickness
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Barrel Wall Thickness | ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Great, that explains it clearly. I'll check it and see what it measures.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Another thread with some minimum wall thickness content:
http://parkerguns.org/forums/showthr...hlight=minimum |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Barrel Wall Thickness | ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||||
|
![]()
Great info. Thanks for the threads and references. Very helpful.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|