Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Possible restock on a VH
Unread 12-20-2011, 11:03 PM   #1
Member
Gene Langston
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Default Possible restock on a VH

I found a VH with a pretty nice stock, and was wondering if it has been restocked. According the PGCA, it was ordered in 1906, and there was no mention of an upgrade. It's got 32" barrels, and the weight listed at 7.5 pounds although it now weighs 8.5 pounds, and I wonder if there wasn't some typo error. It's a 2 frame of course.

Any opinions would be appreciated.

Gene Langston is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-20-2011, 11:11 PM   #2
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,848
Thanks: 38,444
Thanked 35,765 Times in 13,107 Posts

Default

The checkering pattern on the pictured gun is not the checkering pattern of a VH of the 1906 vintage... or any other vintage for that matter. The buttstock wood is far nicer than that which would normally have been used for a VH. Remington, later in the late 1930's used American Black Walnut with more figure than Parker Bros ever used but still not that nice... IMHO.

The forend however, is likely to be original.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 12-21-2011, 07:15 AM   #3
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Gene,

While perhaps not completely original, that 32" VH is a very nice gun!

I have many 32" Parkers and a #2 frame weighing only 7.5 pounds would need an unstruck barrel weight not much more than 4 pounds. I have a couple 32" DH/DHE's at 8 pounds. I also own a 32" GH on a #1 frame that weighs 7 pounds but the barrels are not thick.

Once again, nice gun!
Mark
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-21-2011, 07:31 AM   #4
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,598
Thanks: 3,327
Thanked 13,129 Times in 3,476 Posts

Default

I guess it's fairly obvious the stock isn't original, but, as Dean says, it's a pretty nice piece of wood. In fact, too nice to fuss with. If it were me, I'd keep my eye out for a correct stock for a V grade, and save that one for the B grade that comes down the road later. (that's called positive thinking) Then worry about the checkering.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-21-2011, 08:08 AM   #5
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,043
Thanks: 529
Thanked 19,567 Times in 4,957 Posts

Default

Yes, surely a restock on that VH. Beautiful though. Full feather crotch is great. Not always the strongest if it gets into the wrist. But it looks like you might have enough straight grain through the wrist and head.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 12-21-2011, 09:23 AM   #6
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,468
Thanks: 6,712
Thanked 9,813 Times in 5,207 Posts

Default

If I had that stock on a 32" VH, I would not be looking for an original stock. Nice gun. What is the frame size and unstruck barrel weight to end up at 8 1/2 pounds? My 32" VH on a #2 frame is an 8 1/2 pound gun. I don't know the unstruck weight because the gun is away on a vacation.
Bill Murphy is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-21-2011, 09:32 AM   #7
Member
Gene Langston
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Default

I think the unstruck weight is 4 pounds, 6 ounces. And it's a size 2 frame.
Gene Langston is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-21-2011, 11:50 AM   #8
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,906
Thanks: 4,388
Thanked 4,102 Times in 1,739 Posts

Default

I don't know if its just the picture but the stock looks pretty thick at the wrist.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-21-2011, 12:08 PM   #9
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Gene,

With that unstruck weight I don't think a well-balanced #2 frame Parker could be much under 8 pounds. Maybe there was an error in the record of the gun's weight and the 7 was actually an 8?

Mark
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-21-2011, 12:38 PM   #10
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,044
Thanks: 1,838
Thanked 5,405 Times in 1,505 Posts

Default

The original gun most likely did not have a rubber recoil pad. The addition of a rubber pad, even when cutting the stock can increase a gun's overall weight by as several ounces to maybe a 1/2 pound. There is a recoil pad on the restock.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.