![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
There is no way to know and the price is ridiculous.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
This gun was discussed earlier this year. Same question and same price.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Yeh, the claims of many sellers goes beyong the pale. Just look at, for example, some gunbroker auctions, and many parkers are "rare" or in "great original conditon" only to be found to have cut barrels or be very common. I have seen three Parkers in the past week that have cut barels according to the book, and the sellers either do not care or are dishonest and continue to list them as original. Caveat emptor
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
I thought we settled this a long time ago; the "scarce, the "rare", the "raw' and the "cooked"! Got to set some boundaries here!!
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
As long as there are sellers who are either uninformed themselves or of shallow ethics hoping to snag an uninformed buyer these words are likely to continue to be used. Again, caveat emptor.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|