![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Oh yeah. A pull of the trigger and... nothing. Oops!
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
I was shooting a single trigger Parker GHE for a while and then went back to a DT gun. First couple of pairs I messed up bad. It doesn't take long to develop habits.
Thanks for posting the video. You will find that pitting in the barrels is not all that much of a concern. Wall thickness is mostly what counts. But, no matter how much you check out a new set of barrels, there is always that thought in the back of you mind the first time you pull the trigger. Try shooting one of the very early Parkers without rebounding locks. After firing, you have to pull the hammers back to safe before you can open the gun. Adds another step in there to confuse things.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Non-rebounding hammers? Wow, I would probably screw that up at least a few times.
I poked around a bit, but I didn't find any information about when rebounding locks were introduced on Parkers. Searches using Google's excellent patent-search function suggest that rebounding locks became popular in the mid 1870s, but that's a rough estimate. Any idea about the date of introduction for rebounding locks on Parker guns? |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|