Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Why a SST on a double gun?
Unread 09-15-2013, 06:53 AM   #1
Member
SXS OHIO
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,669
Thanks: 571
Thanked 2,106 Times in 572 Posts

Default Why a SST on a double gun?

Anyone know why they wanted to produce a SST when the double trigger system is functional, reliable, less expensive to make and faster to operate? Did any of the big makers explain their reasoning for them? Was this the first of the gadgets we really did not need? Or was there a good reason to invent it? In the time of the new repeaters (pumps) that have only one trigger, was it marketing ploy to be like them...just keep pullin that trigger. I really do not understand the need...Thanks all SXS ohio
Kenny Graft is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2013, 07:08 AM   #2
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,042
Thanks: 529
Thanked 19,562 Times in 4,957 Posts

Default

Maybe it was for the same reason that they came out with the O/U shotgun. People just like some things certain ways and claim they cannot adapt to something different. I hear it all the time that it is Hard to get used to two triggers. But I think it becomes habit pretty quickly.

I do think that there is no better or quicker selector than just moving your finger to the other trigger.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 09-15-2013, 07:17 AM   #3
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,598
Thanks: 3,327
Thanked 13,129 Times in 3,476 Posts

Default

Most of my Parkers are double triggered, it takes me a few shots to get used to, when going back and forth. I suppose I prefer double triggers over selective singles, certainly over non-selective triggers.
I'm not sure why you say a single isn't faster, I believe it is. One thing I do know is many people miss their second shot because they are moving more than their hand when going for the second trigger. As their hand is moving back, the muzzle goes down.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2013, 07:20 AM   #4
Member
chris dawe
Forum Associate
 
chris dawe's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,197
Thanks: 2,626
Thanked 2,884 Times in 620 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
Maybe it was for the same reason that they came out with the O/U shotgun. People just like some things certain ways and claim they cannot adapt to something different. I hear it all the time that it is Hard to get used to two triggers. But I think it becomes habit pretty quickly.

I do think that there is no better or quicker selector than just moving your finger to the other trigger.
I agree Brian with the ease of a double trigger set up ...I never had an issue from day one,because I never thought about it...as soon as you start thinking "which trigger ?"when a bird gets up , you'll probably push the top lever and open the gun .

I have a grand total of two with single triggers ,I can use them both just fine ,but they don't look right .

I always thought it was just mans desire to have the next best thing
chris dawe is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2013, 07:22 AM   #5
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,042
Thanks: 529
Thanked 19,562 Times in 4,957 Posts

Default

I should rephrase... A single trigger is certainly faster to pull off the second shot. But double trigger is faster for selection process in a heat of the moment decision.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 09-15-2013, 07:42 AM   #6
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,125
Thanks: 4,009
Thanked 7,117 Times in 1,377 Posts

Default

A single trigger and particularly one in the rear position is nice to have on a frosty morning, in the blind, etc when you had those period cotton work gloves gloves on. Some doubles have as little as 7/8-inch opening between the triggers.
Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2013, 08:27 AM   #7
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Srebro View Post
A single trigger and particularly one in the rear position is nice to have on a frosty morning, in the blind, etc when you had those period cotton work gloves gloves on. Some doubles have as little as 7/8-inch opening between the triggers.
Agreed! Same for hunting Ruff Grouse in the snow. I hate most single triggers but own a 20 gauge Sterlingworth with a Miller which is my late season grouse gun! I also own a Super Fox with a Kautzky single trigger which functions flawlessly on icy cold mornings!

Mark
__________________
Don't hunt with a gun that will embarrass your dog!

USMC Retired
USMC Distinguished Marksman
USMC Distinguished Pistol Shot
NRA Benefactor - Ring of Freedom member
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2013, 08:41 AM   #8
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 623
Thanked 2,589 Times in 929 Posts

Default

Everyone has their preferences... and abilities.

I've shot double triggers all my life. And actually believe they're faster than a single trigger. For me.

As for "sales" advantages, I believe telling someone their length of pull stays consistent also has some weight. But in reality, that "advantage" is just hogwash.

Bottom line, they could charge a premium for a trigger that could fail far more often. Brilliant.
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2013, 09:54 AM   #9
Member
Brush Buster
PGCA Member
Second Badge
 
Russ Jackson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,332
Thanks: 3,463
Thanked 3,851 Times in 1,177 Posts

Default

I believe it was a marketing strategy ,same as all of the Short Mag. rifle cartridges of today,totally unnecessary but sell like hot cakes, people in general love gadgets and this would have been something new in Doubles about the same period as the single triggered pumps and semis ! If it was a genuine issue to have a single trigger ,I think the Big gun makers like Parker ,Fox etc would have had it early on , if you think about it ,why not ,Rifles always were single trigger ! Again ,Just my opinion !
Russ Jackson is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2013, 10:09 AM   #10
Member
charlie cleveland
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,806 Times in 3,970 Posts

Default

i think each poinnt thats been made here certainly has its merits.. i mostly shoot double triggers..i only have 1 gun with a single trigger its a lc smith 20 ga i only bought it because of the single trigger and ejectors and selector..yep i like them triggers one or two now dont know about 3... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.