Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-31-2013, 09:12 AM   #11
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,701 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

Strike "low" and substitute moderate and you have it correct.

But check your stock wood carefully.

1893 Parker catalog:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg smokeless 005.jpg (510.4 KB, 5 views)
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 01-31-2013, 09:43 AM   #12
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,292
Thanks: 381
Thanked 4,338 Times in 1,407 Posts

Default

The original article, and many more of interest
http://books.google.com/books?id=inQ...gbs_navlinks_s

p. 32 Powder Pressures At Different Parts of the Gunbarrel, 1895
http://books.google.com/books?id=inQ...essure&f=false
(scroll down and click on p. 31)

Last edited by Drew Hause; 01-31-2013 at 06:23 PM..
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 01-31-2013, 12:54 PM   #13
Member
Eldon Goddard
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 846
Thanks: 312
Thanked 390 Times in 170 Posts

Default

You would think someone would be doing this work now. It does not seem that hard to do if you had the equipment. I am not sure about the accuracy of crusher gauges, but that was the best they had then. Not suprisingly higher pressure loads are less linear.
Eldon Goddard is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-31-2013, 04:08 PM   #14
Member
BRDHNTR
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,107
Thanks: 8,822
Thanked 3,114 Times in 1,411 Posts

Default

Thanks Gents
Allen
allen newell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-31-2013, 06:15 PM   #15
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,292
Thanks: 381
Thanked 4,338 Times in 1,407 Posts

Default

Have been working through the original document and the graphs Pete posted and came up with this.

32 Gr Ballistite (3 Dram Equiv.)
Breech - 2.9 Tons per Square Inch (UK, Long) = 6496 psi (pound force per square inch)
2 1/2" - 2.2 Tons = 4928 psi
6” - 1.2 Tons = 2688 psi
12” - .81 Tons = 1814 psi
18” - .33 Tons = 739 psi
24” - .21 Tons = 470 psi

83 Gr No. 4 Black Powder
Breech - 2.26 Tons = 5062 psi
2 1/2" - 1.96 Tons = 4390 psi
6” - 1.26 Tons = 2822 psi
12” - .9 Tons = 2016 psi
18” - .33 Tons = 739 psi
24” - .21 Tons = 605 psi

SO once again, the pressure is falling rapidly with either Black Powder or Smokeless and is quite low by 18"
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 02-01-2013, 01:14 PM   #16
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,292
Thanks: 381
Thanked 4,338 Times in 1,407 Posts

Default

Turns out the conversion is alot more complicated

Using the estimate Lead Crusher Pressure (Cp) conversion to PSI (pound force per square inch)
(Cp x 1.5) - .5 = TSI, TSI X 2240 = PSI

32 Gr Ballistite (1 1/8 oz at 1232 fps muzzle velocity = 3 Dram Equiv.)
Breech - 2.9 Tons per Square Inch (UK, Long) = 8624 psi
(2.9 x 1.5 = 4.35, 4.35 - .5 = 3.85 TSI, 3.85 x 2240 = 8624psi)
2 1/2" - 2.2 Tons = 6272 psi
6” - 1.2 Tons = 3718 psi
12” - .81 Tons = 1602 psi
18” - .33 Tons = 1120 psi
24” - .21 Tons = 694 psi

83 Gr No. 4 Black Powder at 1222 fps
Breech - 2.26 Tons = 6474 psi
2 1/2" - 1.96 Tons = 5466 psi
6” - 1.26 Tons = 3114 psi
12” - .9 Tons = 1904 psi
18” - .37 Tons = 1232 psi
24” - .27 Tons = 896 psi

Last edited by Drew Hause; 02-01-2013 at 06:15 PM..
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 02-01-2013, 01:51 PM   #17
Member
Eldon Goddard
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 846
Thanks: 312
Thanked 390 Times in 170 Posts

Default

Does anyone know how high the thermal stresses are? What kind of temperatures are reached? Or are the thermal stresses small in comparison to the other stresses that they are ignored?
Eldon Goddard is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-01-2013, 02:03 PM   #18
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Eldon,

The stresses are calculated as for a pressure vessel. Thermal doesn't seem to be a significant factor.

Mark
__________________
Don't hunt with a gun that will embarrass your dog!

USMC Retired
USMC Distinguished Marksman
USMC Distinguished Pistol Shot
NRA Benefactor - Ring of Freedom member
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-01-2013, 04:03 PM   #19
Member
Eldon Goddard
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 846
Thanks: 312
Thanked 390 Times in 170 Posts

Default

Thanks Mark,
That is what I figured. It is to bad we did not have a chance to meet at the Las Vegas gun show. I would like the chance to speak more on these interesting subjects.
Eldon Goddard is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-01-2013, 06:37 PM   #20
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,545 Times in 1,719 Posts

Default

Didn't Sherman Bell produce some pressure curves with smokeless and BP curves? Anyone have them handy?
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.