What I know about the 16 gauge:
They used to be quite popular, being lighter than 12s and still shot good patterns with and oz or 1 1/8 of shot.
I read that the magnum 20 was a heart shot for the 16, which was on shakey legs anyway. I had never shot a 16 until I shot mine and since then I've developed a liking for them, or if for no other reason that I like being different. (I still like girls tho.) In addition my two 16s are quite a lot lighter than a like model 12. A lot lighter.
I hear people are complaining when some one cuts loose with a magnum 20. I've never fired one, but I guess they crack similar to a .410. The report of a .410 bothers me. I also read that the mag 20 shoots a long, ragged shot stream that does not pattern well. We also know that for standard range shooting more muzzle velocity doesn't make much diff when it comes to killing birds. So why the mag 20? I hear of very few hunters are using them. Is that so? They, and I, shoot the standard length 20 gauge shell.
I think that when magnum mania hit the rifle world it trickled over to the shotgun folks, thus the 3" magnums. I have never shot them in any gauge, even if shooting at ducks. I'm a 2 3/4 shell guy even with steel. If I ever shoot steel through my new Wingmaster 20 I'll probably shoot a 3" steel shell....if I decide to go duck hunting with a 20.
If the mag 20 is falling from favor then the 16 IMHO just might come roaring back. I hope so.
People have a harkening for the past. If they made a new Model A, I'd buy one, even without seat belts. Doesn't putt putting around in a Model A sound like fun? For the same reason, folks might harken after the 16. It would give us all another reason to buy a new gun. If they made a new strong damascus gun in 16 I'd buy one of those too.
If Connecticut Arms made a new damascus tube don't you think it'd sell like hotcakes? NOTHING shotgun IMO is more beautiful than a damascus barrel. I'd love to fit one into my 97.
|