![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||||||
|
![]()
My guess is it saw hard usage in the duck marsh.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||||||
|
![]()
Probably stored in a closet or under a bed with no protection from change of season temps and humidity.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||||||
|
![]()
Notice how the checkering is worn down. That indicates to me it got a lot of use. It could have been the victim of other disasters as well, though
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||||||
|
![]()
It looks like it has potential, particularly if the bores are clean
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||||||
|
![]()
Yes, that buttstock is a replacement and looks like it may not be a Parker original replacement. The forend is original.
Overall it is a good candidate for restoration providing the bores are good. The engraving is not too badly worn. A few screws messed up. And it is complete... save the stock. But its all there and workable. And a 1 frame too.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||||||
|
![]()
a rare c grade for the collector on a budget?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||||||
|
![]()
This gun has alot of potential. The rib engraving looks correct to me. Most Bernard guns I have examined have hand engraved rib legends.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | ||||||
|
![]()
It must depend on the era or something. Because some were roll stamped.
I agree that this gun is a great candidate for some restoration work.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|