Edgar, I was going to start a thread about it when it happened but I thought discretion was the better part of valor. It doesn't just sound like censorship-it is censorship!
My comment then was merely that my experience with the company was that customer service was poor and others shared that view. It was not a comment about any particular person. Similar comments had been made in prior posts but I was admonished for mine. I thought I was owed an explanation as to why honest comment was disfavored but wasn't entitled to the explanation apparently. Not sure why. After all, I'm a card carrying member of the PGCA!
I'm not sure why Mr Galazan needs to be defended. I don't know him but I'm sure he is a gentleman, who, as other have observed, can defend himself if need be. If "unpleasant" remarks have been made about his company, maybe he should look into it rather than merely ignoring them after others have apologized for their misguided brethren. IMHO and I have no bone to pick with anyone about it.
|
Threaded Mode