Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-14-2013, 10:49 AM   #1
Member
Duckman
Forum Associate
 
Peter Clark's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 361
Thanks: 261
Thanked 445 Times in 126 Posts

Default

John,
I am no expert but having both, the only thing I see is that the newer ones look newer if taken care of (because they are newer) and the wood is fancier for lower grade guns like VH or VHE. My two 1935 guns are tight as a bank vault. I wish my repros closed up that way. I think the early ones like mine were made in the factory, in the same way and by the same people as before Remington bought them.
-plc-
Peter Clark is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter Clark For Your Post:
Unread 01-14-2013, 11:11 AM   #2
Member
John Havard
PGCA Member
 
John Havard's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 382
Thanks: 754
Thanked 367 Times in 87 Posts

Default

From the "manufacture date by serial number" page here on the PGCA website it would appear that all shotguns post-'34 are not considered "Parkers" by the cognoscenti?
__________________
Blissfully retired and doing exactly what my better half tells me.
John Havard is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit John Havard's homepage!
Unread 01-14-2013, 11:33 AM   #3
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,102
Thanks: 4,550
Thanked 3,011 Times in 969 Posts

Default

John,

A very distinctive and beautiful feature of the stock of any uncut Parker (VH/GH) is the widow's peak buttplate. When Remington eliminated this in favor of just a curved buttplate, I'm sure as a savings in manufacturing, the tide had turned from making a product as it had been made for forty years to making a profit. I do not like that feature on the later Remington/Parkers in the lower grades.
Jerry Harlow is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jerry Harlow For Your Post:
Unread 01-14-2013, 11:54 AM   #4
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,698 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Harlow View Post
John,

A very distinctive and beautiful feature of the stock of any uncut Parker (VH/GH) is the widow's peak buttplate. When Remington eliminated this in favor of just a curved buttplate, I'm sure as a savings in manufacturing, the tide had turned from making a product as it had been made for forty years to making a profit. I do not like that feature on the later Remington/Parkers in the lower grades.

Jerry, Remington did not eliminate the peaked dog's head buttplate. Parker Bros. did. The change started in 1921 and was generally complete by 1926, although later guns can be found sometimes with the peak as old inventory was used. See TPS for details. I have a 1921 gun, made by Parker Bros in Ilion with the flat DHBP. There were many cost savings measures taken over many years in an attempt to keep the Parker gun price competitive.

If a new V or G grade Parker was to be produced today , with quality of the mid production years, my guess derived after talking to informed makers, is that it would cost $17,000 to $20,000. The new excellent AAHE 28ga costs $50,000..... few have been sold yet the price is not unrealistic.

1921 P with flat DHBP:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg phe 008.jpg (56.0 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg phe 003.jpg (501.9 KB, 5 views)
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 01-14-2013, 12:11 PM   #5
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,102
Thanks: 4,550
Thanked 3,011 Times in 969 Posts

Default

Bruce,

Sorry for being wrong. I thought Remington, once Parker was purchased, was the one that went completely to the flat buttplate on those grades? I have always associated the flat buttplates with the Remington era. I guess I need to read TPS more often and stop just looking at the photos.

My apologies.
Jerry Harlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-14-2013, 12:33 PM   #6
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,474
Thanks: 6,723
Thanked 9,823 Times in 5,214 Posts

Default

John Havard, maybe the wording in the "date of manufacture" section could have been better chosen. Maybe "under Remington ownership" might be clearer than "Remington gun".
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.