Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-20-2012, 03:22 PM   #1
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,915
Thanks: 4,389
Thanked 4,112 Times in 1,744 Posts

Default

I wonder how many were scraped during the WW2 era metal drives. My guess on remaining Parkers would be about 1/3 total production.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-20-2012, 05:50 PM   #2
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,546
Thanks: 6,765
Thanked 9,893 Times in 5,255 Posts

Default

Come on, Dave. I have read the come ons about sending guns to England. I would not have given up a fluid steel Parker to those libbos. If they asked me to get on a boat with a Garand, OK, but send them my bird gun, no way.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 09-20-2012, 07:09 PM   #3
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,059
Thanks: 1,869
Thanked 5,448 Times in 1,515 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Suponski View Post
I wonder how many were scraped during the WW2 era metal drives. My guess on remaining Parkers would be about 1/3 total production.
I have wondered the same thing myself, by 1942 ammo and gun manufacturer warnings on shooting Damascus and Twist barrels guns were well established. There was a promotional effort to make people believe such guns were essentially decorative items, most thought they were obsolete and dangerous. By that time the Dam/Twist guns were most likely in the hands of 2nd and 3rd owners. Patriotism was especially strong, people wanted to contribute to the war effort, sacrafice was the order of the day, rationing of gas, rubber, butter, sugar. I believe many Dam/Twist guns, hammer and hammerless, maybe a majority of them, were melted down to help produce the arsenal of democracy. Attrition of fluid steel guns is probably substantial but less than composite barrel guns.

From an article on the WWII scrap drives:

Many of the other materials collected couldn't readily be recycled either. Many who lived through the war remember collecting old newspapers, but apart from using them as packing material and such there was little to be done with them. A 1941 aluminum-scrap drive to help the plucky Brits pulled in 70,000 tons of aluminum pots and pans, but only virgin aluminum could be used to manufacture aircraft.

Iron and steel were a different story. These metals could be easily melted down and used for munitions. It's not as if the U.S. lacked domestic sources of iron ore, though. The real challenge was gearing up American industry for war production. That meant everything from increasing steel-making capacity to building more factories and designing better weapons. Recycling of steel and iron unquestionably helped. One campaign netted five million tons of steel in just three weeks, and scrap-metal drives continued for most of the war.Useful though recycled steel and iron were, some scrap drives went overboard. In addition to old streetcar tracks, wrought iron fences, church bells, and the like, people carted off relics of previous wars, including cannons, park statues, and other memorials. When the memorials were being rebuilt after the war, many wished they hadn't been so hasty.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-20-2012, 07:59 PM   #4
Member
Parker Bachelder (Brad's Profile)
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 296
Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,928 Times in 203 Posts

Default

O.K., I have tried to stay out of this post, but Pete you struck a nerve with the words "promotional effort". You are far too kind. I believe that the manufacturers intentionally bereated composite barrels for the sake of profit. I absolutely agree that those warnings on ammo boxes caused the premature surrender from service for many, many composite barrels. Fortunately there is a growing number of us that understand what happened.
Composite barrels are the "state of the art" in shotgunning history. I don't want to know how many have been lost to ignorance, but I agree that the number is most likely very high.


Brad
Brad Bachelder is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Brad Bachelder For Your Post:
Visit Brad Bachelder's homepage!
Unread 09-20-2012, 08:26 PM   #5
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 32,963
Thanks: 38,682
Thanked 35,904 Times in 13,166 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Bachelder View Post
I believe that the manufacturers intentionally bereated composite barrels for the sake of profit. I absolutely agree that those warnings on ammo boxes caused the premature surrender from service for many, many composite barrels. Fortunately there is a growing number of us that understand what happened.
Composite barrels are the "state of the art" in shotgunning history. I don't want to know how many have been lost to ignorance, but I agree that the number is most likely very high.


Brad
Brad, I couldn't agree more strongly.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.