Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 01-14-2012, 10:40 AM   #14
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,698 Times in 2,676 Posts

Default

John, I don't think they were any heavier than other guns of the time with croille damascus barrels. For example, the straight gripped 12/30 I showed is 7lbs 10. The 16ga is 6/6, so it is lighter than many other 1 frame 16/28's and lighter than a similar 16 I have with fluid steel barrels. The 1891 12/30 is an 8lb 6 gun, a heavy waterfowler. Many gunners wanted heavy guns for max fowling loads, so that's what they ordered. You can find lightweight Bernard game guns, but they are less common than the heavy ones. There is nothing inherent in a Bernard that says it has to be heavy.

Comparing damascus of any form with fluid steel, yes, I think the damascus barrel is a little heavier, but not much. Its anecdotal only, and perhaps an interesting study for someone, a typical damascus/Bernard 12 ga 2 frame barrel will be .034 and fluid steel .030. If we had numbers from a lot of guns, a better conclusion might be drawn. On the fowlers, you'll commonly see .040.

Bruce Day, but don't confuse me with an expert
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.