Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 12-25-2011, 02:13 PM   #30
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,058
Thanks: 1,868
Thanked 5,447 Times in 1,514 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Ouellette View Post
Pete,

A roll crimp is great for pressure reduction.

Less "ejecta" should lower pressure.

I would start with a "cool" rather than a hot primer.

Mark
Mark a roll crimp would be impractical as I would use this load for volume shooting (crow hunting). Good point on the primer, a Remington STS or Fiochhi 616 (209 type) looks like it would bring pressure down further.

I got out my scale and weighed an SP10 wad and the 16ga .135 cards and a .250 16ga fiber filler wad. Ejecta (including powder) is 6% less for the 2 7/8" load. So we would have a 10% decrease in powder, 6% decrease in ejecta and it's using a cooler primer. My guess is this load would be in the high 7000's PSI but that is nothing more than an "educated" guess. I think might try these and call Precision to find out how to go about getting a 5 shot ballistic test done to find out for sure.

http://www.armbrust.acf2.org/primersubs.htm
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.