 |
|
 |
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account!
To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
10-27-2011, 03:45 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,308
Thanks: 948
Thanked 2,796 Times in 642 Posts
|
|
Richard,
In Connecticut the DEP controls all wildlife. Considering all the revenue generated from licenses and equipment sales by turkey hunters I do not plan on much action being taken here to control the turkey populations.
I'm not sure but I think the fisher was reintroduced and is somewhat protected in an effort to control turkeys but based on the seven chickens I just lost to a fisher I would say they would really hurt the grouse populations as well.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Larry Frey For Your Post:
|
|
|
|
10-27-2011, 04:42 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
|
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,671
Thanks: 3,373
Thanked 13,418 Times in 3,538 Posts
|
|
That may be true Larry, but extending the season and increasing the bag limit wouldn't cut into revenues, but, in fact may increase it.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode