Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 10-06-2009, 09:18 AM   #6
Member
Don Kaas
Forum Associate
 
Don Kaas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 560
Thanks: 0
Thanked 223 Times in 92 Posts

Default

Once again, the issue is where on the barrels tubes you are measuring. FOR ME,.100" at the end of the chambers and .025" anywhere (that can be measured) along the tubes would be a prudent minimum for 100 year old small gauge barrels shooting low pressure modern loads. As Dean points out Parker made many "light" 0 frame guns where these figures be marginal even when new. Many British Damascus guns have been proven for "nitro" loads with barrel specs similar to these. I have owned and shot these with the same loads I would use in a comparable fluid steel gun. Very few Damascus barrels have survived without "cleaning", "browning" and/or dent removal. I received a PGCA letter yesterday on a #1 frame D grade toplever in 12 gauge that went back to Meriden no less than 3 times for all of these operations each of which reduced barrel wall thickness...
Don Kaas is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.