![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#23 | ||||||
|
The chamber length is the only logical thing, except it could have been less cryptic if it was stamped '3" chamber', that and the obvious fact that they aren't lengthened.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#24 | ||||||
|
Since the "3" is stamped on both sides my current theory is that this Parker was ordered with 3/4 chokes (Improved Mod). Both chokes have 28-30 points of constriction and both are full tapered and without a parallel run. That's indicative of factory choke work and not some guy with an adjustable reamer who had at 4/4 (Full) chokes.
Surely, many of our enthusiasts have never heard of 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 and 4/4 chokes but that's how they were often referred to a century ago. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#25 | |||||||
|
Quote:
. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
#26 | ||||||
|
Never?
That's a tough call, Dean. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Stan Hillis For Your Post: |
|
|
#27 | |||||||
|
Quote:
I posted here asking what 3's stamped on both barrel flats might indicate on this 208000's Parker (1924). And I later confirmed the chambers are factory length at 2-5/8" and were not lengthened to 3-inch. I also proposed a theory that a 3 stamped on each flat might have been done to indicate 3/4 choke (Improved- Mod) which in fact both chokes do measure at 28 and 30 points of constriction. With all that in mind Dean's reply citing Remington era choke markings doesn't add any value. My question to Parker experts was and is, what might the 3's indicate on a 1924 gun? And I ask that any future replies focus on that question, and not to get replies with a sermonette that doesn't pertain or add value. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post: |
|
|
#28 | ||||||
|
My apologies to you Frank and anyone else I’ve offended.
My “never” comment was meant as a standard Parker practice. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
#29 | ||||||
|
[QUOTE=Dean Romig;452913]My apologies to you Frank and anyone else I’ve offended.
My “never” comment was meant as a standard Parker practice. Apologies? I don't think you said anything offensive. Just stating your opinion. Your input is appreciated I am sure.
__________________
"Training is like fighting a gorilla, you don't stop when you are tired, you stop when the gorilla is tired" |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Reggie Bishop For Your Post: |
|
|
#30 | ||||||
|
With all that in mind Dean's reply citing Remington era choke markings doesn't add any value
You wanted the Parker experts opinion and he stated that he was not aware that Parker marked choke designations on the barrel flats, how is that not helpful? Curiosity question, how many American SXS gun manufacturers marked the choke designations on the barrel flats using the 1-4 number system? |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|