![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#173 | ||||||
|
It's been awhile, here is the latest version of my Comprehensive Short Ten loading data spreadsheet, updated through 1/17/26. There are four new loads since the last update thanks to people on this page, I have highlighted those loads and all of them use currently available components.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post: |
| Hull differences |
|
|
#174 | ||||||
|
I am curious if anyone has experience with some of the older, long-discontinued hulls found in some of these recipes--and if they perform significantly differently than any others. For example, the attached highlighted load. To me, it seems suspect that that much lead on top of that much longshot would produce so little pressure. But, that is not a hull with which I am familiar. Do some of these older hull designs make that big a difference?
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#175 | ||||||
|
I have the same question. I only got into reloading the short ten recently and have scrounged a variety of hulls - Winchester, Federal, Remington, new Cheddites. At modest pressures, are these all relatively interchangeable?
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#176 | |||||||
|
Quote:
__________________
No man laid on his death bed and said,"I wished I would have worked more" |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to scott kittredge For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|