Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2025, 03:14 PM   #1
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,659
Thanks: 6,846
Thanked 10,036 Times in 5,317 Posts

Default

Edgar made a great attempt to explain why a gap would exist at the doll's head after a set of barrels was refitted after correcting wear at the hook and the loop. Unfortunately, I don't see why any "new" gap would exist after making corrections at the hook and loop. Maybe Mr. Dudley would tell me if I am right or wrong. And I'm not making any negative comment about Russ Bickel's work, only about comments made in this thread about guns that have nothing to do with Mr. Bickel's work. Changes in the breech face usually have nothing to do with a gun getting loose. That is why the hook and the loop are usually corrected when a gun gets loose. Again, maybe Mr. Dudley will tell me whether I am right or wrong. I have never seen a breech face filed so the barrels can be set back, therefore creating a gap at the shoulders of the doll's head.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Old 02-07-2025, 04:16 PM   #2
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,616
Thanks: 3,339
Thanked 13,203 Times in 3,493 Posts

Default

Bill, It was Brian, Not me, who gave the explanation for the gap.

The photo here shows a gun which was off face by enough to see daylight, roughly a sheet of copy paper. Aurora Micro Welding laser welded the hook for me, and I dressed it back down with a 3/8" round diamond file, smoking the hook and the dolls head the whole time. Prior to welding, the front hooked edges of the dolls head were just rubbing the recess. When I finished dressing the hook, the dolls head was no longer rubbing, and if you look closely, you'll see the gap on the front edge. I consider this more than acceptable.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_7731.jpg (75.3 KB, 7 views)
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Unread 02-08-2025, 10:08 AM   #3
Member
Skybuster
PGCA Member
 
Jeremy Toeper's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 16
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edgarspencer View Post
Bill, It was Brian, Not me, who gave the explanation for the gap.

The photo here shows a gun which was off face by enough to see daylight, roughly a sheet of copy paper. Aurora Micro Welding laser welded the hook for me, and I dressed it back down with a 3/8" round diamond file, smoking the hook and the dolls head the whole time. Prior to welding, the front hooked edges of the dolls head were just rubbing the recess. When I finished dressing the hook, the dolls head was no longer rubbing, and if you look closely, you'll see the gap on the front edge. I consider this more than acceptable.
Thanks for posting your personal example, it explains what I had assumed would be the case for bring a gun back on face. The barrels are being set back on the standing breech and so everything moves back with it, including the dolls head. I was not aware that the dolls head was fitted after the barrels where brought on face at the factory.

Funny you should mention Puglisi's as an example for how guns should look. All of the screenshots are from Puglisi guns on GI. GI allows a zoom function and the zoom probably does make it look worse, but that wasn't the intention. Just speculation as to how or why this may happen.
Jeremy Toeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-08-2025, 04:34 PM   #4
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,659
Thanks: 6,846
Thanked 10,036 Times in 5,317 Posts

Default

Sorry, but when "setting the barrels back", nothing about the relationship between the breech face and the breech end of the barrels changes. All changes are at the hook and loop. When the hook and loop are repaired, the relationship between the doll's head and the breech face are not changed. Maybe Brian Dudley can comment. Again, am I right or wrong?
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-08-2025, 04:57 PM   #5
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,616
Thanks: 3,339
Thanked 13,203 Times in 3,493 Posts

Default

Bill, that has been my experience, on the few I have put back on face. If I'm reading Brian's description, he says it is possible there may be a change in the dolls head fit, but I'm not sure how.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.