|
Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
 |
|
 |
03-18-2023, 06:59 AM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,198
Thanks: 2,629
Thanked 2,885 Times in 620 Posts
|
|
Guys all this talk of originality honestly baffles me,how do anyone know today what was original 120 years ago ? Sure something could've been written down ,someone else can discover it and follow directions word for word,but with something like cch were all subtle nuances followed directly ? Are the materials in use from the water to charcoal to heat source the exact same? There's been documented finds of pristine unused guns ,but was the same person there when the gun was bought 100 years ago are they the same person who finds it in a closet looking through the same eyes? Has time taken no effect ? Did someone in the 1960s start up cch as there was a personal desire or sound need for the long forgotten service ,could they not claim that thier rediscovery of the process is exactly like the original? Who the hell could argue? Great tactic if you ask me ...there are subtle things in particular makers that are of note, like the lighter center of the Parker floorplate ....a clear lacquer can be used gloss or satin ,colors can be buffed out before lacquer like I pretty sure was done in Michigan
Same goes for any of the restoration process ,it's very difficult to exactly duplicate what was done so long ago metal or wood ,good work and process does ,although speak for itself ...if you want a gun to look as good as possible don't hold back on the restoration process ,and in the end if the individual is happy with thier "new " gun that's really all that counts and any of the old relics saved and put back in use is a battle won for the future of our pastime
|
|
|
The Following 24 Users Say Thank You to chris dawe For Your Post:
|
allen newell, Bill Murphy, Bob Kimble, Brian Dudley, Buddy Harrison, Dan Steingraber, Dean Romig, edgarspencer, Garry L Gordon, Gary Carmichael Sr, GunnerGrilli, Hal Sheets, Harold Lee Pickens, John Campbell, keavin nelson, Ken Snyder, Mark Garrett, Mark Landskov, Mike Koneski, Phil Cloninger, Phillip Carr, Richard Mason, Stephen Hodges, William Woods |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno - 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.
|