Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 07-12-2022, 07:58 PM   #1
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,237
Thanks: 39,432
Thanked 36,501 Times in 13,343 Posts

Default

Inertia will do it every time when it meets a fixed object regardless if that object is “stuck” in position.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 07-12-2022, 08:46 PM   #2
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,672
Thanks: 3,373
Thanked 13,422 Times in 3,539 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
Letting the science do the talking, those “striations” could be simply the result of lateral stretching of the metal.
The term for "streching" is Elongation; one of the four basic maesurements obtained in a destructive test bar. Tensile, sometimes expressed as UTS, Ultimate Tensile Strength, Yield Strength; the point at which the specimen will no longer relax to it's original length (2") RA, Elongation, as a percentage of the pre-measure 2" measured length, and lastly, Reduction of Area, the amount the specimen reduced at the point of failure. The area at the failure of the test bar has a somewhat different appearance, dependent on the alloy, but looks nothing like those 'striations', which, in my opinion, are on the surface. I also doubt there was any linear stretching, simply because the failure area reach (1st) Yield, then UTS and elongation.
A properly heat treated specimen fails in a very predictable, and repeatable manner; the numbers only varying because of the percentage of individual alloying elements.
On average, we produced between 25 to 30 individual heats (Furnaces batches of steel) per week, and it's safe to say we would break between 6 and 20 tensile specimens per heat (not to mention creep strength tests, Charpy (V notch)Impact tests, and weld bend tests)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ED J, MORGAN View Post
That seems logical as the metal expanded the radius on the out side being greater than the inside would tear first,
You are quite correct. The area of the failed tube is the CxOD minus the CxID.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Lester View Post
I am not engineer and have no experience or training in the physics and engineering involved with a barrel burst. What I find counterintuitive as a layman is the amount of pressure required to burst a fluid steel barrel is around 30,000 psi per Sherman Bell's destructive tests. How is it that a shot charge and wad being pushed by a force between 11,000 and less than 30,000 psi wouldn't dislodge and send a thin plastic base wad stuck in the bore out the muzzle before it reached a level of barrel burst pressure? Serious question looking for an answer. Perhaps the answer is the pressure builds faster than the ejecta moves but I don't know that.
Bell's burst tests were on unobstructed tubes, and, I think This tube was obstructed, and in pretty close proximity to the charge. The spike was (obviously) catastrophic. The pressures rise initially, after firing, and decrease the further down the bore they are measures. Within a few inches of the forcing cone, they're going up fast, but with no bore to go down.

I remember some work done by a Proof House, that took deliberately sealed tubes of various lengths, and measured the resulting failures. I found it while in the library at Leeds University, no doubt waiting for the pubs to open on a Sunday evening. That was an exchange year from RPI, and despite learning a lot, found the pubs dramatically more interesting than the labs.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Interesting Comment Regarding Win Wads
Unread 07-14-2022, 02:44 PM   #3
Member
Gary Laudermilch
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,330
Thanks: 3,049
Thanked 2,114 Times in 677 Posts

Default Interesting Comment Regarding Win Wads

I was explaining the burst barrel using Win factory loads. One guy said he purchased some older Win 20 ga wads. When loading them something did not feel right so he took the shell apart where he discovered the wad crush leaves had snapped at the hinge. He took several wads and manually crushed them and all snapped at the hinge. In the trash they went. Not sure if this is germane to this burst barrel but it could be.
Gary Laudermilch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gary Laudermilch For Your Post:
Unread 07-14-2022, 03:00 PM   #4
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,672
Thanks: 3,373
Thanked 13,422 Times in 3,539 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Laudermilch View Post
I was explaining the burst barrel using Win factory loads. One guy said he purchased some older Win 20 ga wads. When loading them something did not feel right so he took the shell apart where he discovered the wad crush leaves had snapped at the hinge. He took several wads and manually crushed them and all snapped at the hinge. In the trash they went. Not sure if this is germane to this burst barrel but it could be.
I, too, trashed several bags of the older, white AA 12ga wads. The petals would break off at the base.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.