![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Austin,
It seems by the letter that the Twist barrels were ordered in 1880, also explaining the "2" stamping. The Damascus barrels are the original set, listed in error in the books. I would guess a $100.00 dollar grade on up, by descriptions in the 1874 Reduced Price List. How would you describe the rest of the gun? Type of walnut, etc? Another thing to try is look for a grade number stamped near the serial number, in the wood underneath the trigger guard. I realize that Parker Brothers did not have a grading number system in place in 1875, but they were working on it for the future. I used to own #3313, made in 1874, which had such a number stamped in the wood. Dave |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Grading Early Guns | ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
I agree with everyone, but would like to draw this out a little. I have always set a value that the lowest grade damascus gun was a grade 2. This was supported by three diamonds in the fore end checking pattern, and a little figure on one side of the butt.
Could barrel 1 really be barrel three? Interesting especially since the two existing barrel sets still match weight. The lock engraving seems to have been roll marked, then chased. Was roll mark engraving being considered for grade 1? How would you assess the dominating factors on grade determination: Barrel Steel? Engraving? Frame Sculpture? Wood Quality? Checking pattern? A grade number found on any original part could nullify all these? We need some good examples and opinions for Summer Parker Pages Best, Austin |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|