Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-26-2021, 05:36 PM   #1
Member
Harold Pickens
PGCA Member
 
Harold Lee Pickens's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,949
Thanks: 2,328
Thanked 8,961 Times in 2,244 Posts

Default

Unless you have damascus barrels, what is the worry with higher PSI. PSI does not even factor into the equation for recoil.
An RST 1/2 oz load at 1200 fps will have the same recoil, in the same gun as a modern 1/2 oz load at the same fps.
__________________
"How kind it is that most of us will never know when we have fired our last shot"--Nash Buckingham
Harold Lee Pickens is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Harold Lee Pickens For Your Post:
Unread 11-26-2021, 06:15 PM   #2
Member
classicioi
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 309
Thanks: 1,276
Thanked 249 Times in 103 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harold Lee Pickens View Post
Unless you have damascus barrels, what is the worry with higher PSI. PSI does not even factor into the equation for recoil.
An RST 1/2 oz load at 1200 fps will have the same recoil, in the same gun as a modern 1/2 oz load at the same fps.
Harold,

Why do people shooting Parker guns that have fluid steel barrels buy and shoot RST low psig shells ?

I've heard it said here many times that using Low Pressure RST shells will help head off potential problems with the older wood...
Karl Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-26-2021, 06:44 PM   #3
Member
Harold Pickens
PGCA Member
 
Harold Lee Pickens's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,949
Thanks: 2,328
Thanked 8,961 Times in 2,244 Posts

Default

Hi Karl, good question for sure. #1. Many shoot RST because they have short chambered fluid steel guns, such as 2 1/2", and modern shells are 2 3/4".
Recoil is the problem with older wood and PSI does not enter into the recoil equation. Of course PSI is a factor in safely shooting our damascus barrels.
I load a lot of low pressure loads myself, all 2 1/2 ", so I can shoot them in all my guns.
RST keeps fps to a modest level, say 1150 to 1200 fps, and alot, but not all modern shells seem to be high velocity.
RST also keeps the payload minimal--3/4 to 1oz ( 3/4 oz in a 12, 16, or 20 is a sweet shooting load.).
Thus with a smaller payload, lower velocity, the recoil is less--and less problems with the vintage gun stocks--and thats why I shoot them.
Again Google or visit the recoil formula and PSI is never mentioned. The weight of the gun is critical, ie the same load recoils less in an 8 lb gun than it does in a 6 lb gun.
__________________
"How kind it is that most of us will never know when we have fired our last shot"--Nash Buckingham
Harold Lee Pickens is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Harold Lee Pickens For Your Post:
Unread 11-26-2021, 06:56 PM   #4
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,448
Thanks: 6,360
Thanked 8,934 Times in 3,933 Posts

Default

I’ve got an IJ Hercules and a Crescent Arms . I shoot my regular old 1200 FPS handloads and whatever the WIN / REM / Federal factory skeet loads are in both and haven’t had any problems to date . Might add I even shoot the factory 3” loads in the Hercules from time to time .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines !
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.