Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 01-26-2021, 06:21 PM   #8
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,178
Thanks: 542
Thanked 20,108 Times in 5,060 Posts

Default

This IS supposed to be a 1-1/2 frame. The stock books for that time period had "1/2" hand written in as an abbreviation for 1-1/2. They eventually went to a Rubber hand stamp for "1-1/2".
I cover this extensively in my First written work on James Hayes prototype guns. in 2013. in both the DGJ and PP.
The Parker Story incorrectly speculates that the prototype gun that I wrote about was a 1/2 frame gun and that is because of these notations in the stock books. It is a notion that is easily dismissed when looking at the actual gun and also all of the other surrounding entries in the stock books.


It is interesting to see an "OG" research letter. Issued by Remington. I knew that they would do these on request.

Figure 6 - 226709 Stock Book.jpg


See here a scan from 1928 for 226709 and the 3 guns before it. Note the 1/2 frame size notation before the serial. That gun IS a 1-1/2 frame gun.

This is the barrel lug.

101_0863.jpg
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.