Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-30-2020, 10:28 PM   #1
Member
jeffery c
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 344
Thanks: 183
Thanked 165 Times in 73 Posts

Default

I've read that the very last ones had 4 bites. Interesting engineering, one bolt is described as a split lock. Parkers inside are consistently nicely made, I kind of suspect Remingtons might be close or equal. I wonder if anyone knows how they compared in cost in 1909 to Parkers?
jefferyconnor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-31-2020, 02:05 PM   #2
Member
Jack
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 48
Thanks: 107
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jefferyconnor View Post
Parkers inside are consistently nicely made, I kind of suspect Remingtons might be close or equal. I wonder if anyone knows how they compared in cost in 1909 to Parkers?
As far as the lower grades are concerned, Remingtons were priced in about the same range as Parkers.

Remington discontinued all their double guns in 1910, and their catalogue that year listed the Model 1900 (the lowest priced gun) starting at $30 and the better grade 1894 starting at $45. However, it was sometimes possible to find the Remingtons at a discount - for example, the 1908 Sears catalogue offered the Model 1900 for $23.50.

Compare this with the initial price for a Parker Trojan of $25.50 in 1912 and the VH for $34.50 that same year. I've heard it said that Parker was losing money selling Trojans for $25.50 and they soon had to increase the price.

The Remingtons were good guns, and I own several Model 1894s and 1900s, but I don't think the workmanship measures up to Parker standards.
Jack Huber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2021, 02:56 PM   #3
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,087
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 5,500 Times in 1,533 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Huber View Post

The Remingtons were good guns, and I own several Model 1894s and 1900s, but I don't think the workmanship measures up to Parker standards.
Are you familiar with the graded 1894's? The workmanship is outstanding and it could be argued the engraving is better i.e. no flying turnips.
__________________
Progress is the mortal enemy of the Outdoorsman.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 01-05-2021, 03:15 PM   #4
Member
Jack
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 48
Thanks: 107
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Lester View Post
Are you familiar with the graded 1894's? The workmanship is outstanding and it could be argued the engraving is better i.e. no flying turnips.
No, I'm not. Except for one Remington BE grade 1894, my experience is limited to the 1900 K grades and 1894 A grades.
I was comparing my K grade Remingtons to my Parker Trojans and my A grade Remingtons to my VH Parkers. While the Remingtons were very good guns, I feel that the Parkers were built better in the lower grades. There was almost no engraving on those models, so there was nothing to compare in that respect.
Jack Huber is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.