Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-03-2011, 02:34 PM   #1
Member
CHE
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 244
Thanks: 712
Thanked 104 Times in 62 Posts

Default

There may be pieces of a coil spring in the firing pin hole. Some had a coil spring to retract the pins and they rust and break. If all else fails make new pins
tom leshinsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2011, 03:28 PM   #2
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,915
Thanks: 4,389
Thanked 4,112 Times in 1,744 Posts

Default

Ian, This is a hammerless gun....correct?
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Coil springs and 'new pins"??
Unread 01-03-2011, 03:32 PM   #3
Member
Old and Reliable
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 1,674
Thanked 363 Times in 239 Posts

Default Coil springs and 'new pins"??

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom leshinsky View Post
There may be pieces of a coil spring in the firing pin hole. Some had a coil spring to retract the pins and they rust and break. If all else fails make new pins
-- My basic knowledge of Parker guns only applies to the hammerless series-- the term used here "made new pins" could be a bit misleading, and the hammerless Parkers had the firing pin (striker) forged with the entire hammer, then machined to print dimension. Now LC Smiths (and other sidelocks) tend to have separate firing pins (strikers) and there, if you have Lt. Col. Brophy's book on specs.- and the machining ability, you could indeed turn out replacement pins on a lathe.

Parkers have rebounding locks, as listed on their catalogues and hang tags, I believe, that pretty much state you can "dry-fire" them w/o snap caps and cause no harm to the firing pins- I have never opened up a AH Fox boxlock gun, but seem to recall the now late Mike McIntosh mentioning the one thing (in his opinion) deficient in the fine Fox action was the lack of rebounding hammers.

However, as I believe in gremlins that snafu computers-anything is possible. I own a older GHE 12 that was originally a GH- was fitted with ejectors later, but not at the factory. So- it is entirely possible that some enterprising gunsmith may have added coil springs to a Parker as an experiment to rebound the strikers after firing.

I have a good friend originally from Germany- retired Mechanical Engineer from Allis-Chalmers, at the Yooper shoot I left my 12 3E Smith for him, as he has worked on many European shotguns and rifles as a gunsmith- he wanted to see if an older Smith like mine with the bushed firing pins was adaptable to your concept of a trapped coil spring to rebound the firing pin tip- not a bad idea, as they are "free floating" in the bushing and receiver breech, if you have the hammers cocked and open a Smith with the muzzles downward, you'll see the tips of both strikers protruding!
Francis Morin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.