![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
More info? | ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
There are several around that number that are ten (10) gauge.
Pictures and more details will help. This is because Price & Fjestad in the “Serialization Book” indicate 60990 will be a 12 gauge. The book is known to have typos, so the actual piece in your hand (and pictures) will let you tap into the forum knowledge bank. Chamber size is not indicated in the book. How have you measured the chamber size?
__________________
” It's amazing the things people will post when ignorance is celebrated on the internet.” — Meghan Superczynski, for Boss Shotshells, Bridgman, Michigan |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Do not shoot that gun with any loads until you have had a DOUBLES EXPERT check those chambers. That gun was not built for 3.5" loads.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
Just because a 3.5" shell "Fits" does not mean it is chambered 3.5".
I am sure if they made a 4" shell, it would "fit" as well. Have the gun properly checked out. Please.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
Back in the 1890s our ammunition companies offered 10-gauge shells in lengths from 2 5/8 inch to 3 1/4 inch. While the heaviest loads the ammunition companies offered were 1 1/4 ounce, I'm sure many old timers were stuffing a lot more in those long cases. The 10-gauge had pretty much settled in to 2 7/8 inch by the turn of the century. NPEs in the various lengths were still cataloged for a while, but none longer than 2 7/8 inch survived The Great War.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
My Grade 2 ( Quality G ) made in 1890 SN 60065 letters to have been ordered with 3” chambers and 100 3” Berdan brass shells.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
I swear for goodness I can’t seem to stop acquiring Parker 10’s . Had what appears to be a rather decent PH arrive at the shop yesterday , this is a mid teens gun I think it’s the youngest 10 gauge I own . Most of mine are 1881-1900 as far as 10’s are concerned .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines ! |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CraigThompson For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Charlie Price did a presentation at the 7th Annual Meeting and Conference at Cleveland, Ohio, July 21, 2001, titled Parker Gun Gauges Over the Years.
Charlie's tables show 10-gauge production peaking in the 1881 to 1885 period with 11,632 made, but even at that behind the 14,470 12-gauges. From then on 10-gauge production fell sharply -- 1886 to 1890 --4294 1891 to 1895 --2526 1896 to 1900 ---311 1901 to 1905 ---340 1906 to 1910 ---181 1911 to 1915 ----88 1916 to 1920 ---156 1921 to 1925 ----79 1926 to 1930 ----84 1931 to 1935 -----8 1937 to 1942 -----7 |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Here are some pics, please bare with me |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Todd Porter For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|