 |
|
 |
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
10-04-2019, 10:13 AM
|
#1
|
Member
|
PGCA Lifetime Member Since Second Grade
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,900
Thanks: 6,988
Thanked 10,337 Times in 5,455 Posts
|
|
Getting back to Craig's original post, I am of the opinion that ATF does not want "non guns", in other words, pre 1898, in a licensee's bound book. Their reasoning is that a non gun is none of their business.
|
|
|
|
10-04-2019, 10:21 AM
|
#2
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,524
Thanks: 6,487
Thanked 6,693 Times in 888 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy
Getting back to Craig's original post, I am of the opinion that ATF does not want "non guns", in other words, pre 1898, in a licensee's bound book. Their reasoning is that a non gun is none of their business.
|
My understanding is that this has nothing to do with ATF and everything to do with New York’s safe act.
|
|
|
|