![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Actually, 176,127 and 176,129 are listed in the serialization book as earlier examples of the single traps. I don't know how Mr. Peck found that 176,129 was the earliest in the order books unless he has access to the PGCA record files. Maybe Mr. Peck got our historian/researcher, Chuck Bishop to search the records for him. We know that there are earlier entries than 176,129, and maybe earlier than 176,127. In the serialization book, there are hundreds of missing entries prior to the mentioned serial numbers. The serialization book is compiled of stock book entries. Order book entries are a different animal and may include many more earlier single traps than 176,127. Investigation continues.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
On the topic of the earliest Parker SBTs, this gun does not have the finger groove FE
Fred Gilbert took delivery of a Parker SBT SN 180116 in 1917. In 1919, at age 54 he made a straight run of 589 with it. ![]() Other examples Outers' Recreation, November, 1919 https://books.google.com/books?id=l3...J&pg=PA383&lpg October 1919 Forest & Stream illustration without the finger groove https://books.google.com/books?id=F9...J&pg=PA568&lpg Was the finger groove FE the standard? When was it discontinued?
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
In more than 60 years of studying, buying, and shooting Parker singles, I have never seen one with the grooved forend treatment pictured in Parker ads.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|