![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Winchester Loads | ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
I don't have the 1899 catalog, but have the Winchester 1890 and 1910. More varieties of loaded shells and cases were available in 1910, but brass cases were still available. Winchester offered the choice of propellant and shell length in 500 shell orders.
Remington continued to produce loaded black powder shells through the 1930's, but did not resume production after WW 2. Best, Austin |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
In 1920, WRA Co. said their 'First Quality' empty brass shells were for black and smokeless powders. The 'New Rival' and 'Nublack' paper shells were specifically for black powder. The 'Leader' in 8 gauge and the 'Repeater' in 24 and 28 gauge were the only other black powder offerings. The 'Leader' and 'Repeater' shells, made predominantly for smokeless, were available with DuPont, Schultze, Dead Shot, E.C, Infallible, and Ballistite smokeless loads.
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired 'Earnest Will' 'Desert Shield' 'Desert Storm' 'Southern Watch' |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
i sure am learning a lot from this discusion....im lead to believe that most folks went to smokless powder earlier than i thought...relearned that black powder is rougher on gun and shoulder than smokless.. charlie
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to charlie cleveland For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
You and me both Charlie.
I have also learned that there’s some unwarranted fear’s, misconceptions and "silence". On the positive side it did create the small low pressure shot shell industry, as well as the low pressure gun rag police force over the years. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|