 |
|
 |
|
Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
 |
English Best compared to a Parker |
 |
09-25-2018, 06:23 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 724
Thanked 1,521 Times in 405 Posts
|
|
English Best compared to a Parker
I am curious how an English best gun compares to a Parker? I know people say they are like comparing apples and oranges as being two different guns, but I am not asking which is better.
I am more curious what is it about English Best guns that is so different? Partly I am trying to grasp what makes a Best gun a Best gun, but also just what is different about them compared to a Parker.
I have stumbled upon an English Best Boxlock gun that is intriguing to me. It has bushed firing pins and double safety sears and better internal fit and finish on a 28 inch barrel with a 15 inch LOP on some gorgeous wood topping the scales at a 6lbs 3 oz 12 gauge.
I have read enough to realize that most Best guns are considered sidelocks, but this one is a boxlock which is far more appealing to me.
So any assistance in understanding what a BEST gun is and how they differ/compare to Parkers would be quite appreciated!
Cheerio
__________________
"The Parker gun was the first and the greatest ever." Theophilus Nash Buckingham
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
09-25-2018, 07:32 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,286
Thanks: 1,812
Thanked 4,397 Times in 1,226 Posts
|
|
There really is no comparison - almost without exception, American double guns started life as basic utility grade hardware store guns, and underwent successive elaborate embellishments (e.g., more select exotic wood for stocks, intricate checkering and carving, extensive engraving commensurate with the ascending grade(s), polishing and plating of internal parts, etc.) as the price went up. In essence, they were all assembled from pre-manufactured parts much like an assembly line automobile.
To really understand the difference between these guns and the British "bests", I highly recommend watching on YouTube the British Shooting Times production of "Purdey Guns and Rifles" (or any of the similar Purdey presentations), to really understand the almost primitive nature of the approach to building a "best" gun. The presentation is about an hour long and well worth the investment in time; I find the segments on stockmaking and sidelock construction and regulation absolutely mesmerizing. I have watched it at least a dozen times and often go back to selected segments to absorb the magical way they produce their fine guns. (Holland & Holland have equally good feature films on the construction and finishing of their guns.).
|
|
|
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Kevin McCormack For Your Post:
|
Bill Holcombe, Bill Jolliff, Bill Murphy, Dave Noreen, Ed Norman, Eric Eis, Eric Estes, Jay Gardner, keavin nelson, Lloyd Bernstein, Mark Ray, Rich Anderson, Russell E. Cleary, Timothy Salgado, tom leshinsky |
|