Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Ejectors VS Extractors
Unread 09-26-2010, 07:37 PM   #1
Member
C.O.B.
Forum Associate
 
Rich Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,079
Thanks: 2,220
Thanked 6,330 Times in 2,084 Posts

Default Ejectors VS Extractors

Whats your preferance? For years I favored the ejectors, why I have no real idea. It is easier to reload with gloves on with the ejectors. I never let the empties fly out and onto the ground. No point in advertising. Now that I have acquired a few guns with extractors I find no real hinderance in them. My position at this stage of the game is ejectors/extractors who cares just as long as it's a Parker
Rich Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2010, 08:22 PM   #2
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,289
Thanks: 1,196
Thanked 3,741 Times in 1,018 Posts

Default

I favor ejectors. Any shotgun that I would consider a "Best Gun" has to have ejectors---but an extractor gun ain't bad.
Greg Baehman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2010, 08:36 PM   #3
Member
GH-16
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,009
Thanks: 5,308
Thanked 1,315 Times in 450 Posts

Default

Quote:
"My position at this stage of the game is ejectors/extractors who cares just as long as it's a Parker"
Well said Richard!!

When I'm hunting I prefer extractors, simply for the ease of taking care of the empties. I was raised with the leave no trace when your done ethics and extractors help with this goal in mind.

I do catch the empties with ejectors as well, but there is always that once or twice that they go flying. Murphys law must kick-in, because it seems like it only happens in the thickest cover and I spend the next half hour looking for one used shell. The dogs don't like it much either when I'm looking at the ground mumbeling to myself and kicking weeds rather than letting them hunt.
Paul Ehlers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2010, 08:50 PM   #4
Member
Ed Blake
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 773
Thanked 859 Times in 351 Posts

Default

Extractors and double triggers. Keep it simple.
Ed Blake is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2010, 09:28 PM   #5
Member
TARNATION !!!
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Jack Cronkhite's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 868
Thanked 2,386 Times in 661 Posts

Default

Hopefully, I'll find out on Friday. GHE heading for roosters. So far, I have only had extractors. My first thought on the question is:

Potential problems increase in direct proportion to the number of parts.

Extractor - two parts (if you include the screw)

Ejectors - lost count after 15, some are one-offs but others count twice. Somebody else will know the total but it's way more than 2.

That said, I haven't any experience with them and haven't heard much on the discussion forum about ejector problems. Seems Mr. Parker ran a quality enterprise.
__________________
Hunt ethically. Eat heartily.
Jack Cronkhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2010, 10:13 PM   #6
Member
King Brown
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 257
Thanks: 1
Thanked 176 Times in 92 Posts

Default

I don't use my Elsie Specialty as often as I should because of its powerful ejectors.
King Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2010, 10:26 PM   #7
Member
C.O.B.
Forum Associate
 
Rich Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,079
Thanks: 2,220
Thanked 6,330 Times in 2,084 Posts

Default

I have been shooting ejector Parkers for almost ten years and the only problem I have had was a broken rod on the "Hollywood" gun which I shoot for sporting clays every Sunday when it's not hunting season. Maybe I'll take her out for Pheasants this fall.

I always cup my hand over the barrels when I open the gun to catch the empties.

My last two Parkers one ejector, one extractor both 16's, both perfect
Rich Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2010, 10:31 PM   #8
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,896
Thanks: 4,385
Thanked 4,074 Times in 1,731 Posts

Default

I own and shoot both. But I prefer extractors.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-27-2010, 12:16 AM   #9
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,538 Times in 1,717 Posts

Default

I mostly have extractor guns and like them for hunting. I dislike leaving hulls laying around and often pick up those that I find. I get used to catching empties from the ejector guns also. For simplicity and reliability, I'll take extractors. The only thing on a Parker that I have never dismantled is the ejector assembly.
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-01-2010, 06:33 PM   #10
Member
C.O.B.
Forum Associate
 
Rich Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,079
Thanks: 2,220
Thanked 6,330 Times in 2,084 Posts

Default

Chalk up another one on the extractor side of the ledger
Rich Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.