Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-30-2018, 11:39 AM   #1
Member
Craig Budgeon
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 508
Thanks: 144
Thanked 388 Times in 225 Posts

Default

Richard, the intent of a lighter rear trigger pull is not to make it lighter, the intent is to make the sear engagement identical to the front trigger. When equal engagement is achieved the rear trigger pulls up to a half pound less because of the increased distance from the axis to the finger pull. In addition to your theory of reasons to increase rear trigger pull, Dan @ MST shared a popular theory there, that since rear triggers have more leverage, pull weight is increased so that it feels like the front trigger. To me this theory is BS and furthermore increasing trigger pulls also increases sear wear.
Craig Budgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Craig Budgeon For Your Post:
Unread 01-30-2018, 05:04 PM   #2
Member
MD*GSP
PGCA Member
 
Scot Cardillo's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 640
Thanks: 1,120
Thanked 698 Times in 249 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Budgeon View Post
Richard, the intent of a lighter rear trigger pull is not to make it lighter, the intent is to make the sear engagement identical to the front trigger. When equal engagement is achieved the rear trigger pulls up to a half pound less because of the increased distance from the axis to the finger pull. In addition to your theory of reasons to increase rear trigger pull, Dan @ MST shared a popular theory there, that since rear triggers have more leverage, pull weight is increased so that it feels like the front trigger. To me this theory is BS and furthermore increasing trigger pulls also increases sear wear.
Craig, thank you for the mechanical explanation regarding front & rear trigger pulls.

Your statement however, is contradictory. On one hand you provide the mechanical explanation for a higher rear trigger pull (leverage) but then, call BS on the very same principal cited by another, that, supports your explanation

Maybe you're simply saying an increased pull on the rear trigger is unnecessary? Can you elaborate??
Scot Cardillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.