Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-15-2017, 10:25 PM   #1
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,072
Thanks: 531
Thanked 19,764 Times in 4,983 Posts

Default

The raw frames had enough metal to file them in.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 11-16-2017, 12:07 AM   #2
Member
PML
PGCA Member
 
Patrick Lien's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 772
Thanks: 365
Thanked 1,574 Times in 373 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
The raw frames had enough metal to file them in.
Ok, does anyone have a raw frame that shows this extra bulk? Does this mean that 99% of the guns that Parker made had this excess removed manually and the 1% were shaped specifically for graded guns? I don’t accept that assumption from a company that survived 50 years in the Industrial Age. If you have one, please show me one of those original castings that supports this. I just want to know the TRUTH if it still exists with any facts. A rough forging showing the excess around the bolsters WITH MEASUREMENTS would answer my question.



Thankyou
Patrick
Patrick Lien is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Patrick Lien For Your Post:
Unread 11-16-2017, 07:17 AM   #3
Member
Ralph English
PGCA AHE
Life Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 76
Thanks: 1,476
Thanked 100 Times in 31 Posts

Smile

Based on the time of Patrick's last post, I think this question is keeping him
up at night!
Help please!!
Ralph English is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-16-2017, 07:21 AM   #4
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,072
Thanks: 531
Thanked 19,764 Times in 4,983 Posts

Default

This raw casting is pictured in TPS. I do not know of any others out there. But this woild be before any machining.

EFB57951-581D-41CF-BA3D-579828D2F437.jpg
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 11-16-2017, 07:24 AM   #5
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,072
Thanks: 531
Thanked 19,764 Times in 4,983 Posts

Default

If they were anything like the fox frames, there was a good amount of metal left once the hand took over from the machine.

30E43044-3978-46D1-809A-AEA254736045.jpeg
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 11-16-2017, 07:42 AM   #6
Member
PML
PGCA Member
 
Patrick Lien's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 772
Thanks: 365
Thanked 1,574 Times in 373 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
This raw casting is pictured in TPS. I do not know of any others out there. But this woild be before any machining.

Attachment 58387
Thank you

Patrick
Patrick Lien is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.