And the barrel bolsters.... I thought general grade differentiation started there along with the number of pins? The pin count might be related to the gun being either front action or rear action locks?? I recall reading about that but can't remember where now. But basically the rear action lock required more wood to be removed from the inner stock thus making the stock wrist somewhat weaker. I think these are the 3 pin guns. The 4 pin guns have the front action lock that required more metal be milled out to provide the needed spacing, thus providing the stock to be stronger. Is that correct?
It seemed the mid-1870's was a very transitional time in design with the addition of Charles King to the design team. I believe he began implementing changes and new patents very soon during this time. I think King ended up with like 14 or 15 patents, maybe more through the years of his tenure with Parker?
(I really need to get my hands on the TPS, cause I'm sure most of my Q's have answers in those 2 volumes) Anyway... Also as Dean mentioned there were several price changes in the gun grades during this periods as well. Not to diminish the quality of Rob's gun at all, but the historical pictures of Grade 2 guns of that era bare much more resemblance to his gun than the Grade 3's.
Again, I'm in no way referring to down grade anyone's gun as any Parker is truely a unique and special gun of fine workmanship and historical significance. I'm only trying to better understand the history of these remarkable guns, particularly the early grade lifters of the 1870's.
I and others might benefit from any clarification that those of you with far more knowledge than I of this era could provide. Thank you
Threaded Mode