Varying Prices on a VH

[John Allen]

The internet has made what you describe almost impossible.There are too many individuals who have guns to actually maintain a base price.That is essentially what is happening now.When a gun comes up on the internet or at a show that is too cheap a dealer will pick it up quickly and mark it up for resale.The problem is that there is not enough demand for "average" guns to justify a high price.As I said before mint,rare,or special order guns are bringing more than I have seen in the last 40 years.But the guns with a little wear are going down in price quickly.

[chris dawe]

Other than the interest of conversation , the answers to the question are pretty straight forward and obvious ...and i'm no expert .

-condition
-configuration
-gauge
- last but not least is the simple fact that my friends across the border are quite fond of the Parker gun and rightfully so .... prices up here do not reflect the same interest,one of my biggest pet peeves is having fellow Canadians quote Gunbroker ...my answer is usually "Full your boots!" we all want to find buried treasure or a pot at the end of a rainbow ,but if we're totally honest with ourselves these things are quite the fantasy .

So,at the risk of going slightly off topic .......

I've had the opportunity to have a few guns in pieces on the bench ,from shit to diamonds , in regard to the American made double guns ( and keep in mind I have a soft spot for Lefever sideplate guns ) the Parker is hands down the best made ,fitted and machined of them all ,and we all know how they shoot ...but it smacks of masochistic engineering .

The Lefever is wonderfully simple and ingenious in design, quite well finished inside, can shoot like a house afire but anyone who's been in there can tell you -the stock design is a weak point.

The Fox is quite a simple design and a very attractive frame profile, but the lower grades lack the polish that could be there ,not much bearing surface on the stock head .

The Lc .Smith is a overly complicated and poor design ,the lower grades are poorly finished inside ,the stock head is a nightmare ,but the few that i've shot have been absolute death on tall birds ,they knew something about boring thats for sure .

The Ithaca gun can be pretty, but it lacks the refinement that could've been ,and again poorly finished guns internally .

The 21 I think, is one of the most overrated double guns in history,"the strongest double gun" they claimed ,but almost every 12 gauge that comes across the bench is loose on face and has cracks in the head ...what gives ?

The Remington guns are very well made ,very simple and wonderfully bored ,the stock head is unfortunately weak ,they don't get the recognition they deserve .

There are a dozen more makers,each has their own merits and following but i've made the point with the most obvious

These thoughts are my experince
& opinions and not meant to offend any owners ,each maker made some absolutely beautiful guns that defy description in hand and in the field - so no need to get hot, we can like what we like but what ever tickles our individual fancy ,there's no way in hell we'll shoot a gun today to wear them out hunting like or forefathers did...but the point of all of this was to try and explain why there is such a following for Parker guns ,it's the inherent quality ...and there's lots of them out there from shit to diamonds

Pick apart a few linder Daly guns , Prussian Sauer or any of the big name English guns and your eyes will look at sxs guns in a whole new light