|
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
01-22-2017, 03:36 PM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 165
Thanks: 235
Thanked 101 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Does the .017 constriction in the last inch sound normal?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-22-2017, 05:07 PM
|
#2
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,728
Thanks: 3,418
Thanked 13,602 Times in 3,584 Posts
|
|
This box contains many of James P. Hayes personal choke reamers. Most all are stamped with either his name, or his initials, along with the bore (12, 16, 20, etc) and are also stamped with dates between 1895 and 1903.
Without having a set of centers, some are difficult to measure as they are five fluted. This collection was given to a friend by Charley Parker, in addition to many other tools. They have since been passed to me. I also have James Hayes chamber rim cutters (all the way to 8 ga.) and a few chamber reamers.
Looking at the choke reamers, what is evident is that the cutting portion of the flights varies somewhat between 3 3/16" and slightly over 4" (20ga.)
There were no specific reamers for specific final choke diameters; the reamer was simply pushed further into the bore until the desired diameter was achieved. With this collection, I also obtained the rods which the reamers were screwed to. These rods have adjustable stops, which allowed the breach face to only move so far in relation to the reamer. The length of taper, logically, for a full choke was close to the full length of the reamer, however, a choke considerable more open would have a uniformly shorter taper.
I do not believe there is any data which supports the belief that there was a "Standard" length of taper. As reamers required sharpening, they were ground, on offset centers, and, consequently the length of the cutting portion, at a specific diameter, would become shorter over the life of the reamer. These tools were likely the property of the individual tradesman, and they may have seen many regrinding cycles. Today, the reamer would simply get tossed to the scrap barrel, and operator would take a new one out of the tool room.
|
|
|
|
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post:
|
Craig Larter, Daryl Corona, Dean Romig, Ed Blake, Frank Cronin, Frank Srebro, Gary Rennles, Jerry Harlow, John Cinkoske, Mark Garrett, Paul Ehlers, Russell E. Cleary, Sam Ogle, scott kittredge, Steve Cambria, todd allen |
|