Here we go again

[Paul Harm]

The anti gun crowd would like to chip away at our 2nd Amendment rights. First outlaw some type of weapon, then maybe large capacity magazines, then maybe high taxes on ammo. Each time we'll loose some gun owners and pretty soon where won't be enough to fight them. Then we'll look like England or Australia. If we don't stand together we won't have anything to stand for. Either you're pro gun, or anti gun. If you don't like the way a gun looks, or the size of the magazine, and like to see then outlawed, then you're doing what the anti gunners want and you might as well call yourself anti gun. I do. It's black and white. There's no in between. The NRA is the only reason any of us own a gun today.

[Kensal Rise]

Originally Posted by Paul Harm

The anti gun crowd would like to chip away at our 2nd Amendment rights...

Ahem...
With all due respect to the various posters, please allow me to offer a solution this problem via some judicious alteration of the US Constitution's 2nd Amendment:

ORIGINALLY:
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

ALTERNATIVELY:
A well demonized and maligned militia, being UNnecessary to the security of a police state, the right of the people to keep and, with government approval, bear Federally-approved and aesthetically threatening arms, shall occasionally be infringed at the discretion of the President and/or Department of Justice.

Do I hear any takers? Oh... perhaps one...