 |
|
 |
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
 |
|
 |
01-26-2016, 10:59 PM
|
#10
|
Member
|
PGCA Invincible Life Member
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,351
Thanks: 39,758
Thanked 36,713 Times in 13,410 Posts
|
|
I'll respond to each of these issues that brother Bill has brought up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy
And they were good ones. Nothing about the quality of the people I recommended has changed since 2011.
But apparently you were the only one who thought enough of those nominees to submit their names. That does not negate the quality of their service, it just doesn't put them up with members who received more nominations.
The requirement that submissions be campaigned by the submitter takes away from the importance of the "committee".
There is nothing in the DSA 'program' which suggests anyone should "campaign" for a certain person to be nominated multiple times.
Once I submit a certain person, it should not be necessary for me to get three or four more people to submit that person's name for him to be considered.
It is not necessary that anyone do that. A Member who is worthy of the award should stand out in enough people's minds that they nominate him without being prodded to do so, or 'campaigned.'
When I submit a name and a set of reasons for my recommendations, the "committee" should take over and make a decision.
It is not for the committee to make any decisions as to whom might be worthy of the award - that is entirely up to the membership to decide that by making nominations. The committee is in place purely in an administrative function.
From what I have been told in the past, a certain number of nominations of a certain nominee are neccesary for that person to be considered. That is not the way it should be done.
Not so - there is no number requirement. Nominees need only receive sufficient nominations to place them above others who receive nominations.
Give some power to the "committee" without multiple nominations of a certain person.
The committee has all the power it wants. It is a self-governing committee. The committee does not want to decide who the Awardees are - that is not compatible with the spirit of the program. Can you imagine all the crap and BS that would fall on the committee if we were the ones making decisions of who would receive the Distinguished Service Award?????
PM me or call me to discuss. Thank you.
|
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."
George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno - 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.
|