![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | |||||||
|
Quote:
That was a thought I had too Bill - I just wasn't ready to say it... there is absolutely no evidence of a 1 stamp next to the 2 which would make it a 12. .
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Wayne, is your gun a 00 frame gun with dished out areas in the water table of the action? We have not seen a picture of that area and the frame size marking seems (to my old eyes) to be 00. Descriptions of orders in the Parker order books for 28 gauges usually say from nothing to "light as possible". Actual guns are usually six pounds or a very few ounces less. There doesn't seem to be a lot of difference in 0 frame and 00 frame in standard field guns. Read the article on early 28 gauges in the Parker Pages. I believe the author was Dave Suponski. Some of the research material for that article came from the Parker records, and some came from other sources.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Thank you, Bill. I'm getting a much-needed lesson from very generous and knowledgable members on this site, as I'd hoped. The attached photos show the 00 frame and the water table.
This gun weighs 2-2 + 2-14 + 6 = 5-6, assuming my kitchen scale is accurate, which I believe it is. I'll read Dave Suponski's article. Thank you for the lead. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Wayne Dow For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Wayne, Enjoy the article. Much of my research came from Mr. Murphy
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Suponski For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|