Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-20-2015, 05:10 AM   #21
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,935 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Dennis,

It is common for a Parker of that era to have bores that by today's standards would be regarded as oversize.

Those plug gauges are worthless! Have the choke constrictions measured relative to the gun's bores.

A #2 Frame Parker ten is a sweat gun!

Mark
__________________
Don't hunt with a gun that will embarrass your dog!

USMC Retired
USMC Distinguished Marksman
USMC Distinguished Pistol Shot
NRA Benefactor - Ring of Freedom member
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post:
Unread 06-20-2015, 07:37 AM   #22
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,500
Thanks: 6,410
Thanked 9,019 Times in 3,962 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Noreen View Post
If that cylinder choke is being measured with a plug gauge, that is not an issue.
The bores of an 1889 vintage Parker Bros. 10-gauge are very likely to be much closer to .800" than .775". What are actual measurements with a bore micrometer?
Well now my 1889 EH measures M/IM with a flat gauge . So going by what you say it should be tighter going by the nominal bore diameter ? Is that true also for my Grade 2 circa 1884 top lever 10 gauge , that one by the flat gauge is IC/M both guns have barrels that are uncut .
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-20-2015, 09:09 AM   #23
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,935
Thanks: 1,778
Thanked 8,547 Times in 3,347 Posts

Default

measuring the bores and chokes is the only way to know for sure

as was stated before- choke is a factor of the amount of constriction in relation to the bore size on that gun, not the measurement of the muzzle alone
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-20-2015, 09:25 AM   #24
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,548
Thanks: 6,765
Thanked 9,900 Times in 5,256 Posts

Default

Dennis, to answer your question, yes, the gun is likely to have plenty of choke. An early ten with full choke barrels would measure about cylinder or improved cylinder with a flat gauge.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-20-2015, 05:44 PM   #25
Member
Dennis Martin
PGCA Member
 
Dennis Martin's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 92
Thanks: 117
Thanked 48 Times in 25 Posts

Default

Thanks for the info that each of you has given me. I have the Parker book on order; didn't know it existed. It'll be a great resource. I've loaded some pics of the actual gun off the web and would like to get anyone's and everyone's thoughts on it. Realize pics aren't like in person, but the gun is across country. Price including shipping and transfer will be $3100.00. Don't know exactly why I'm interested, other than it's a good looking gun and not a lot were made. If it turns out to be full and full, I will take it duck hunting once or twice. Otherwise, just enjoy it.
Dennis Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-20-2015, 05:51 PM   #26
Member
Fishtail
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 789
Thanks: 63
Thanked 512 Times in 254 Posts

Default

That forend looks long to me.
greg conomos is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-20-2015, 06:11 PM   #27
Member
Austin J Hawthorne Jr.
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 608
Thanks: 446
Thanked 401 Times in 211 Posts

Default

Very nice looking 10 gauge. There will probably be some discussions regarding the originality of the wood, but I think it is an attractive gun, at a fair price. It would certainly be welcome in my home.
Austin J Hawthorne Jr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-20-2015, 06:14 PM   #28
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,548
Thanks: 6,765
Thanked 9,900 Times in 5,256 Posts

Default

Yes, the forend is suspect. You may want to post some more pictures from different angles and closer up. You could do the same for the stock in the checkering area.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-20-2015, 07:09 PM   #29
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

Might want to have the gun lettered. There appears to be initials in the stock oval. You never no it may have been made for some one important.
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-20-2015, 07:28 PM   #30
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,968
Thanks: 18,205
Thanked 7,750 Times in 2,956 Posts

Default

Nice looking gun Dennis. If it is a 2 frame 10 you will just love how it handles. Enjoy it and don't look back.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less.
Daryl Corona is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.