![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||||||
|
![]()
Ray, and others, you will notice hat I preceded my comment with "IMHO" and everybody has one... an opinion that is.
There are hose who disagree with my opinion and there are "NRA Standards of Condition" but I don't know exactly what they are so I don't resort to them. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||||||
|
![]()
Dean, thank you for sharing your opinion. That's what I asked for in my initial post. Only when there seemed to be such a wide differences in opinion did I wonder if there was an industry standard. Maybe I posed my initial question incorrectly.
Btw, I looked at those NRA standards and they don't help much. They are rather vague and subjective. Maybe there is no answer to my question. Maybe Julia's is what I should rely on as they are a respected leader in the industry when it comes to buying/selling guns. Their evaluations are nothing more than their opinions but it is something to go by. Thx again |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||||||
|
![]()
Very good questions and responses. I to am somewhat confused about CCH %. I also agree that many VH Parkers seem to have more CCH than equal condition higher grades. Ray: Beautiful A. I would love to have one like it even without any CCH. Bob
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||||||
|
![]()
i hope ya ll figure this one out i m confused also...charlie
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||||||
|
![]()
Thx, Bob. I don't think a VH has more. You can just see it better because it doesn't get lost in the engraving. The CCH on guns with less engraving also looks glossy because the polishing if the frame comes through. Frames were highly polished before engraving. The more engraving the more the the glossy appear was removed.
I once saw a circa 1920 BHE that was almost brand new. It had all of its CCH but it appeared dull except for the few areas that were not engraved where it appeared glossy. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||||||
|
![]()
Thx, Bob. I don't think a VH has more. You can just see it better because it doesn't get lost in the engraving. The CCH on guns with less engraving also looks glossy because the polishing if the frame comes through. Frames were highly polished before engraving. The more engraving the more the glossy appearance was removed.
I once saw a circa 1920 BHE that was almost brand new. It had all of its CCH but it appeared dull except for the few areas that were not engraved where it appeared glossy. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||||||
|
![]()
On the other hand, the intricate and delicate engraving of a high grade gun like your AH is often somewhat obscured by a high percentage of CCH. Personally, I would prefer to be able to see fine engraving over vivid CCH. But again, that's just my humble opinion.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | ||||||
|
![]()
I appreciate the question(s) as have been ask, and the answers as they have appeared. I am really curious to hear other thoughts as the thought process really is almost 180 degrees apart, coming from some astute collectors and purveyors.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|