![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
Bruce I don't know where or when you got you AA hull but they short changed you.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Steve Havener For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Paper Shot Shell Lengths
In reviewing old Union Metallic Cartridge Co. catalogues and price lists, the first time I see mention of extra length paper shot shells is in the 1889 catalogue, before they were offering any smokeless powder shells. Smokeless powder begins appearing in the 1891 catalogue. After the introduction of smokeless powder loads the first catalogue I’ve found to offer longer paper shells is 1895 where they offer 10-gauge shells in 2 5/8 and 2 7/8 inch lengths, 12-gauge shells in 2 5/8 or 2 3/4 inch lengths, while 16-gauge is just 2 9/16 inch and 20-gauge just 2 1/2 inch. In the September 1896 catalogue they offer 12-gauge paper "Smokeless" shell in lengths up to 3-inch. All brass 10- and 12-gauge NPEs were offered up to 3 1/4 inch length. By the April 1899 UMC Catalogue things are really taking off and they've added 2 3/4 and 2 7/8 inch lengths to both 16- and 20-gauge offerings, and the 3 1/4 inch 12-gauge length in their "Trap" shell. By the May 1900 UMC catalogue the 3-inch 16- and 20-gauge length is being offered in their salmon colored "Smokeless" shell and their green colored "Trap" shell. That pretty much covers paper shot shell lengths and when they appeared. So, by 1900 we had paper 12-gauge shells in 2 5/8, 2 3/4, 2 7/8, 3 and 3 1/4 inch lengths; 16-gauge shells in 2 9/16, 2 3/4, 2 7/8 and 3-inch lengths; and 20-gauge shells in 2 1/2, 2 3/4, 2 7/8 and 3-inch lengths. From the 1890s into the early 1920s, these longer shot shells didn't carry a heavier payload than one could get in a 2 3/4 inch 12-gauge shell, just more/better wadding, which many serious Pigeon shooters believed to be an advantage. The maximum smokeless powder loads offered in the 2 5/8 inch 12-gauge shell and the 2 1/2 inch 20-gauge shell were a bit lighter than those offered in 2 ¾ inch and longer shells. Early on, one could get smokeless powder loads as heavy as 3 1/4 drams pushing 1 1/4 ounce of shot in a 2 5/8 inch paper shell. Between 1903 and 1910 our manufacturers phased out the 1 1/4 ounce loads in the 2 5/8 inch shell. By 1910 the 2 5/8 inch paper shell was only being offered with 1 1/8 or lighter payloads, and one needed to go to the 2 3/4 inch or longer shells for 1 1/4 ounce loads. Our U.S. manufacturers continued to offer the 2 5/8 inch 12-gauge shells until just after WW-II. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Sam, TPS has a whole chapter on chambers and bores. The answers to your questions are yes yes and yes. I have a bunch from 1883 to 1910 and chamber size is not something I worry about. Some I shoot at ducks with some heavy commercial loads , when I go duck hunting which is once a year or so to remind me about sitting in an icy blind and getting up at 4 am. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post: |
![]() |
Good info! | ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
I don't have TPS...maybe my wife will buy them for me for Xmas Sam |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Sam you can do anything with a 2 1/2 inch shell that a 2 3/4 inch one will do except you never have to worry about chamber length.
__________________
There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter...Earnest Hemingway |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rich Anderson For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Bruce did you wash those hulls in hot water? Maybe yours shrunk in the hot Kansas sun? Up here in the cool climate of the northern New England the AA and STS 12ga hulls are 2 3/4".
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post: |
![]() |
Tags |
barrels, chambers, choke |
|
|