Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-02-2014, 11:50 PM   #1
Member
David Noble
PGCA Member
 
David Noble's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,039
Thanks: 1,724
Thanked 1,308 Times in 468 Posts

Default

Bill, I'd be interested in hearing about the mistakes on the other Remingtons in the auction.
David Noble is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-03-2014, 09:18 AM   #2
Member
C.O.B.
Forum Associate
 
Rich Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,099
Thanks: 2,228
Thanked 6,400 Times in 2,099 Posts

Default

Somebody said there are no stupid questions so here goes. The description says it has ordnance grade barrels. What are these specifically? Why do you feel they aren't correct? These higher grade Remingtons are very nice guns and something I have overlooked so I'd like to learn more.
Rich Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-03-2014, 01:15 PM   #3
Member
Bill Anderson
PGCA Member
 
Bill Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 239
Thanks: 8
Thanked 149 Times in 73 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Noble View Post
Bill, I'd be interested in hearing about the mistakes on the other Remingtons in the auction.
Of the auctions that I reviewed, the two that caught my attention are lot # 1026, which is listed as a CE grade, when actually it is a D grade gun. And lot # 1027 listed as 1876, when actually it is a 1873, which is the only model with the sliding plate which brings the hammers to half cock when you push up on the top lever. There may be more mis-listed items, but haven't gone through them all yet.

Bil
Bill Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-03-2014, 02:31 PM   #4
Member
C.O.B.
Forum Associate
 
Rich Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,099
Thanks: 2,228
Thanked 6,400 Times in 2,099 Posts

Default

So with the Remington guns the difference in barrel steel is similar to the differences in Parker barrels as far as nomenclature goes, Vulcan vs Titanic for example?
Rich Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-03-2014, 03:05 PM   #5
Member
Bill Anderson
PGCA Member
 
Bill Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 239
Thanks: 8
Thanked 149 Times in 73 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Anderson View Post
So with the Remington guns the difference in barrel steel is similar to the differences in Parker barrels as far as nomenclature goes, Vulcan vs Titanic for example?
Yes, that is correct. Ordnance steel was introduced by Remington in 1897, at an extra cost of $10.00, and was recommended for use with heavy charges of nitro powder.

Bill
Bill Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bill Anderson For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.