![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage! | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||||||
|
![]()
A 1 1/8 oz 3 dre load was an intended load for all Parker 12's as made. A Parker service and proof load pressure table is provided in TPS for those interested. Parker loads for 12 through 28 ga are provided in the Small Bore Shot Gun pamphlet for those interested.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||||
|
![]()
Bruce what is the date of the Parker Service and Proof load table in the TPS? If I recall correctly it lists pressures for both 3" 12ga and 20ga guns/shells which suggests to me it applies to guns made in the mid to late 1920's and forward.
Of course I believe every fluid steel Parker made has and will shoot every factory shell in the correct chamber size without problem. Now whether that is good for 70 to 120 year old guns is another question. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||||
|
![]()
The origination date is unclear. P. 515, TPS. The table is based upon historical data from American manufacturers for gauges 10, 12, 16, 20, 28, 32, and 410. Although the table was published in a 1934 article, I have been unable to identify any differences between turn of the century guns and late 1920's guns that suggest that earlier guns were intended for less pressure. Parker shot guns met SAAMI pressures when SAAMI was established, and the pressures used by Parker and other noted makers became the foundation for SAAMI standards ( Small Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers Institute).
Assuming Mr. Cutler's VH 12 is a standard for the type, his gun was intended for a service load limit of between 9500 and 10,800 psi. Not knowing present condition of the barrels, I make no current recommendations. It would have been targeted with 1 1/8 of No. 7 shot at 3 dre if it is like most other 12ga 2 frame guns. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||||||
|
![]()
I have observed one difference in the earlier guns, thinner wrists. Most likely beefed up to handle greater recoil of heavier loads rather than greater pressure.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||
|
![]()
Per Tom Armbrust:
3 Dr. Eq. 1 1/8 oz. Winchester Trap Load 1,202 fps 9,600 psi AA Xtra-Lite 1 oz WAAL12 1189 fps 8000 psi AA 'Low noise Low recoil' 15/16 oz 980 fps 6,200 psi
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||||||
|
![]()
Bruce one of the things I find confusing in the Parker Proof Load Table is the "Definitive Proof Pressure" information. As an example, how the heck do you get 2.5 ounces of shot in a 2 7/8" 10ga much less 260 grains of any kind of powder?
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||||
|
![]()
Pete, I don't know, but makers of proof loads do. They make proof load cartridges for shotgun makers and also for industrial guns to blast out slag from furnaces. I assume that wadding is not an issue and there is likely just a thin spacer between the shot and powder. I have seen proof loads but never taken one apart.
|
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||||||
|
![]() Quote:
In reviewing old Union Metallic Cartridge Co. catalogues and price lists, the first time I see mention of paper shotshell lengths is in 1895 where they offer 10-gauge shells in 2 5/8 and 2 7/8 inch lengths, 12-gauge shells in 2 5/8 or 2 3/4 inch lengths, while 16-gauge is just 2 9/16 inch and 20-gauge just 2 1/2 inch. In the September 1896 catalogue they offer 12-gauge paper "Smokeless" shell in lengths up to 3-inch. All brass 10- and 12-gauge NPEs were offered up to 3 1/4 inch length. By the April 1899 UMC Catalogue things are really taking off and they've added 2 3/4 and 2 7/8 inch lengths to both 16- and 20-gauge offerings, and the 3 1/4 inch 12-gauge length in their "Trap" shell. By the May 1900 UMC catalogue the 3-inch 16- and 20-gauge length is being offered in their salmon colored "Smokeless" shell and their green colored "Trap" shell. That pretty much covers paper shotshell lengths and when they appeared. So, by 1900 we had paper 12-gauge shells in 2 5/8, 2 3/4, 2 7/8, 3 and 3 1/4 inch lengths; 16-gauge shells in 2 9/16, 2 3/4, 2 7/8 and 3-inch lengths; and 20-gauge shells in 2 1/2, 2 3/4, 2 7/8 and 3-inch lengths. From the 1890s into the early 1920s, these longer shotshells didn't carry a heavier payload than one could get in a 2 3/4 inch 12-gauge shell, just more/better wadding, which many serious Pigeon shooters believed to be an advantage. The maximum smokeless powder loads offered in the 2 5/8 inch 12-gauge shell and the 2 1/2 inch 20-gauge shell were a bit lighter than those offered in 2 3/4 inch and longer shells. In that my interest has been smokeless powder shotgun shells and guns, the above has been my canned response for a while. Recently I've noted longer shells offered in an 1889 catalogue when all that were offered were black powder shells and NPEs. |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|