Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-15-2013, 05:24 PM   #11
Member
Bill Zachow
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 625
Thanks: 479
Thanked 416 Times in 211 Posts

Default

Steve, the 8 ounce reduction does seem to be a lot, but is possible if there was a fair amount of solder flash and if Parker had to plane the barrels down to meet a customer's weight requirement. Is there much swamp to the barrels?
Bill Zachow is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-15-2013, 07:27 PM   #12
Member
Parkerman
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 268
Thanks: 394
Thanked 77 Times in 45 Posts

Default

Steven
I remember an article that you did some years ago--a Fox 20 ga that was redone with a remarkable result. I look forward to your fine work on a Parker.

Linn
Linn Matthews is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-15-2013, 07:41 PM   #13
Member
Double Play
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Larry Frey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,308
Thanks: 946
Thanked 2,796 Times in 642 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Dodd Hughes View Post
Anyone study barrel weights as in: these are marked 3/13 ("before striking") and now weight 3/5.
Steven,
In the Spring 2011 issue of Parker Pages, our recently departed friend and author Austin Hogan with the help of a few members did an artical on page 28 entitled "An Old Yankee Adage". In it he compiled a number of stats of which the struck and unstruk barrel weight of a number of guns of various barrel lengths and gauges were listed. In reviewing this information, 8oz seems about average for a 12 gauge in the 28" to 30" range. If your gun were a 26" 20 gauge I would say the 8oz was a bit excessive. If you don't have a copy of this artical and feel it would be useful, let me know and i would be happy to send you a scan for your research. Larry
Larry Frey is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Larry Frey For Your Post:
Unread 03-17-2013, 08:04 PM   #14
Member
Kevin McCormack
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,294
Thanks: 1,826
Thanked 4,430 Times in 1,234 Posts

Default

Steven;

Please tell us the SN of this gun. It may be the key to interpreting the marks in question. The HT/A and K markings are not "unknown or unexplainable"; HT/A could stand for high tensile strength alloy (e.g., chrome or molybdenym) and the K may well stand for a steelmaking process derivative of the Krupp (Germany) process developed and perfected almost in tandem with the English Sheffield steelmaking process of the late 1920's/early 1930's. Winchester took advantage of both in the production of the Model 21, which used steel produced under both formulae throughout the gun, resulting in incredible ductile (psi. resilience and elasticity) properties which represented the first real breakthrough in gun barrel steel making since Sir Joseph Whitworth's "compressed fluid steel" process developed just before the turn of the century (pre-1900). The SN of this gun is crucial to the interpretation of these marks.
Kevin McCormack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.